issue_comments: 296787111
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1252#issuecomment-296787111 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1252 | 296787111 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5Njc4NzExMQ== | 2443309 | 2017-04-24T18:47:24Z | 2017-04-24T18:47:24Z | MEMBER | My two cents. I think we want:
Presumably, we can address many of the negatives with this approach with follow-on PRs. The fallback logic in xarray right now for non-standard calendars is not something we want to keep and was mostly meant as a stop-gap until this feature came along. |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
205473898 |