issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 185181822 and user = 10050469 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Remove obsolete NetCDF4 Error catch · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
303040925 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1060#issuecomment-303040925 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1060 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwMzA0MDkyNQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-05-22T08:58:21Z | 2017-05-22T08:58:21Z | MEMBER | Closing this, might reopen later if needed |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remove obsolete NetCDF4 Error catch 185181822 | |
267681380 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1060#issuecomment-267681380 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1060 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2NzY4MTM4MA== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2016-12-16T19:52:17Z | 2016-12-16T19:52:17Z | MEMBER | I don't have a strong opinion on this. I guess that older systems are bound to a specific version of the C netCDF library, not with a specific python netCDF4 lib, right? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remove obsolete NetCDF4 Error catch 185181822 | |
267675976 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1060#issuecomment-267675976 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1060 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2NzY3NTk3Ng== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2016-12-16T19:27:58Z | 2016-12-16T19:27:58Z | MEMBER | @shoyer we should reach a decision about this small PR: I don't mind closing it as it's not a big deal... |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remove obsolete NetCDF4 Error catch 185181822 | |
257820198 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1060#issuecomment-257820198 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1060 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NzgyMDE5OA== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2016-11-02T09:57:24Z | 2016-11-02T09:57:24Z | MEMBER | Reverted @shoyer feel free to close if you are reluctant to merge this, I don't mind. I still think that it would be great to have a simple way to give custom "netcdf4 like" objects to xarray, though. If you have any suggestion on a good way to go I'd be happy to try an implementation |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remove obsolete NetCDF4 Error catch 185181822 | |
256126088 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1060#issuecomment-256126088 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1060 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NjEyNjA4OA== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2016-10-25T18:25:49Z | 2016-10-25T18:25:49Z | MEMBER | Sure, no pressure! So what about leaving |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remove obsolete NetCDF4 Error catch 185181822 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1