issue_comments
8 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 1685422501 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Fix as_compatible_data for read-only np.ma.MaskedArray · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1551638978 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7788#issuecomment-1551638978 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7788 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cfCHC | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-17T15:45:41Z | 2023-05-17T15:45:41Z | MEMBER | Thanks @maxhollmann I pushed a test for #2377. I see this is your first contribution to Xarray. Welcome! #1792 would be a nice contribution if you're looking for more to do ;) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix as_compatible_data for read-only np.ma.MaskedArray 1685422501 | |
1550187275 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7788#issuecomment-1550187275 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7788 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cZfsL | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-16T18:47:27Z | 2023-05-16T18:47:27Z | MEMBER | Thanks @maxhollmann can you add a note to |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix as_compatible_data for read-only np.ma.MaskedArray 1685422501 | |
1545939343 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7788#issuecomment-1545939343 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7788 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cJSmP | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-12T15:39:24Z | 2023-05-12T15:39:24Z | MEMBER | I defer to @shoyer, the solution with |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix as_compatible_data for read-only np.ma.MaskedArray 1685422501 | |
1545446155 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7788#issuecomment-1545446155 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7788 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cHaML | kmuehlbauer 5821660 | 2023-05-12T09:23:13Z | 2023-05-12T09:23:13Z | MEMBER | @maxhollmann I'm sorry, I'm still finding my way into Xarray. I've taken a closer look at #2377, especially https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2377#issuecomment-415074188. There @shoyer suggested to just use:
instead of
I've checked and it works nicely with your test. That way we would get away without the flags test and the special handling will take place in duck_array_ops. Would be great if someone can double check. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix as_compatible_data for read-only np.ma.MaskedArray 1685422501 | |
1545337724 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7788#issuecomment-1545337724 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7788 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cG_t8 | kmuehlbauer 5821660 | 2023-05-12T07:59:19Z | 2023-05-12T07:59:19Z | MEMBER | @maxhollmann We might get at least some more views on this. There have been discussions on handling masked arrays and we should make sure this is exactly the solution we want to have. @dcherian This changes |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix as_compatible_data for read-only np.ma.MaskedArray 1685422501 | |
1524805132 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7788#issuecomment-1524805132 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7788 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85a4q4M | kmuehlbauer 5821660 | 2023-04-27T06:13:23Z | 2023-04-27T07:19:47Z | MEMBER | @maxhollmann I've checked and memory served well, the following issue might be related: #2377. It looks like your use-case is at least connected to @gerritholl's. It would be great if you could add your original use case (as MCVE, if possible) to get more details. A special case (masked integer arrays) is discussed in #3955. As this might give additional information, it might not exactly fit your problem. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix as_compatible_data for read-only np.ma.MaskedArray 1685422501 | |
1523829332 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7788#issuecomment-1523829332 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7788 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85a08pU | kmuehlbauer 5821660 | 2023-04-26T17:55:13Z | 2023-04-26T17:55:13Z | MEMBER | @maxhollmann I'll have a look into this, I think I've seen something like this some time ago. Maybe you can add the tests to the PR or as comment? This might get more attention and will really help to debug. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix as_compatible_data for read-only np.ma.MaskedArray 1685422501 | |
1523786065 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7788#issuecomment-1523786065 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7788 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85a0yFR | kmuehlbauer 5821660 | 2023-04-26T17:18:44Z | 2023-04-26T17:18:44Z | MEMBER | I've marked this by accident, sorry @maxhollmann. Let us know when you feel this is ready |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix as_compatible_data for read-only np.ma.MaskedArray 1685422501 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2