issue_comments: 1545446155
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7788#issuecomment-1545446155 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7788 | 1545446155 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cHaML | 5821660 | 2023-05-12T09:23:13Z | 2023-05-12T09:23:13Z | MEMBER | @maxhollmann I'm sorry, I'm still finding my way into Xarray. I've taken a closer look at #2377, especially https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2377#issuecomment-415074188. There @shoyer suggested to just use:
instead of
I've checked and it works nicely with your test. That way we would get away without the flags test and the special handling will take place in duck_array_ops. Would be great if someone can double check. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
1685422501 |