issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 148903579 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- keep_attrs for Dataset.resample and DataArray.resample · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
211996971 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/829#issuecomment-211996971 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/829 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIxMTk5Njk3MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-04-19T16:06:03Z | 2016-04-19T16:06:03Z | MEMBER | @mcgibbon thanks. I agree that there is a careful balance when writing test methods between maintainability and readability. I do think fixtures that can be helpful, but we definitely do over-use them right now with our giant test cases -- those should really be cleaned up and split up. I just haven't had the energy to get around to that. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
keep_attrs for Dataset.resample and DataArray.resample 148903579 | |
211506678 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/829#issuecomment-211506678 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/829 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIxMTUwNjY3OA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2016-04-18T18:08:09Z | 2016-04-18T18:08:09Z | MEMBER | @mcgibbon That makes sense to me |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
keep_attrs for Dataset.resample and DataArray.resample 148903579 | |
210955296 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/829#issuecomment-210955296 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/829 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIxMDk1NTI5Ng== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2016-04-17T04:34:52Z | 2016-04-17T04:34:52Z | MEMBER | I know I'm late to the party here. Are there many cases where |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
keep_attrs for Dataset.resample and DataArray.resample 148903579 | |
210939902 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/829#issuecomment-210939902 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/829 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIxMDkzOTkwMg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-04-17T02:20:46Z | 2016-04-17T02:20:46Z | MEMBER | Thanks for diving into this! I think you can write the tests a little bit more succinctly, but otherwise this looks good. Also, please add a note to the "What's New" giving yourself credit. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
keep_attrs for Dataset.resample and DataArray.resample 148903579 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2