issue_comments
1 row where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 1440711212 and user = 14371165 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Handle division by zero in _Normalize._calc_widths · 1 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1311279880 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7272#issuecomment-1311279880 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7272 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85OKIsI | Illviljan 14371165 | 2022-11-11T06:24:06Z | 2022-11-11T06:26:40Z | MEMBER |
With the current version of the PR we would get 18 for 1-sized arrays, but 36 if markersize was undefined. This seems a bit inconsistent to me. I think we should default to 36 instead for 1-sized arrays, but this would require a bit more tweaks than the scope of the current PR. I think we'll merge this to fix the zero division -> np.nan -> empty plots. And then I'll come up with a another PR where the size is the same. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Handle division by zero in _Normalize._calc_widths 1440711212 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1