issue_comments

Table actions

4 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 108271509 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 2

issue 1

  • New encoding keyword argument for to_netcdf · 4 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 4 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
146385570 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/589#issuecomment-146385570 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/589 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NjM4NTU3MA== jhamman 2443309 2015-10-08T00:58:59Z 2015-10-08T00:58:59Z MEMBER

Looks good to me.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   New encoding keyword argument for to_netcdf 108271509
146371615 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/589#issuecomment-146371615 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/589 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NjM3MTYxNQ== shoyer 1217238 2015-10-08T00:06:57Z 2015-10-08T00:06:57Z MEMBER

@jhamman I think fixed the things you pointed out.

@ocefpaf I agree with you about decode_cf. I'm going to leave the current name for now, but we should change/deprecate it in v0.7.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   New encoding keyword argument for to_netcdf 108271509
143334183 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/589#issuecomment-143334183 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/589 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0MzMzNDE4Mw== shoyer 1217238 2015-09-25T19:40:33Z 2015-09-25T19:40:33Z MEMBER

I believe fill values, packing/unpacking and time units are all included in CF conventions by reference, but I agree that the name decode_cf may be confusing. The issue is that I want a practical single option for open_dataset that can disable all of xray's decoding options (which don't always work), just so the data can be examined. These conventions include NUG, COORDS, CF and even some xray specific conventions (so far, only for encoding coordinates without data variables).

Perhaps rather than decode_cf=True, we should have raw=False or decode=True?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   New encoding keyword argument for to_netcdf 108271509
143299023 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/589#issuecomment-143299023 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/589 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0MzI5OTAyMw== shoyer 1217238 2015-09-25T17:40:36Z 2015-09-25T17:40:36Z MEMBER

@ocefpaf could you elaborate a little bit on why you think encoding could be confusing to Pythonistas? To me, the word makes sense because the data can be "coded" on disk according to various conventions and compression settings. This is similar to the situation with Unicode strings and bytes -- you can encode Unicode in various ways into bytes.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   New encoding keyword argument for to_netcdf 108271509

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);