issue_comments
22 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and user = 731499 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- vnoel · 22 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1177245770 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6758#issuecomment-1177245770 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6758 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85GK1hK | vnoel 731499 | 2022-07-07T08:26:26Z | 2022-07-07T08:26:26Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @dcherian Just to be complete, I thought the following one-liner would work as well:
but apparently it produces slightly different results for reasons I don't understand |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
simple groupby_bins 10x slower than numpy 1295939038 | |
| 1177163992 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6758#issuecomment-1177163992 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6758 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85GKhjY | vnoel 731499 | 2022-07-07T06:53:52Z | 2022-07-07T06:53:52Z | CONTRIBUTOR | {
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
simple groupby_bins 10x slower than numpy 1295939038 | ||
| 1176777842 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6758#issuecomment-1176777842 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6758 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85GJDRy | vnoel 731499 | 2022-07-06T21:40:37Z | 2022-07-06T21:40:37Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @dcherian I just tested your numpy suggestions, and I'm getting 100x speedups compared to my naive numpy approach (~200µs vs ~20ms). Thankyouthankyouthankyou! I've been doing this for years, I can't believe I've never run into that particular solution. It's like the IDL histogram function but in numpy. I'm going to use this like crazy Thanks again |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
simple groupby_bins 10x slower than numpy 1295939038 | |
| 1176701867 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6758#issuecomment-1176701867 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6758 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85GIwur | vnoel 731499 | 2022-07-06T20:37:12Z | 2022-07-06T20:37:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @dcherian this means that xarray's groupby_bins will always be slow unless flox is installed, correct? I have unfortunately little or no say on what packages are installed on the system that runs my code. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
simple groupby_bins 10x slower than numpy 1295939038 | |
| 394771642 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2216#issuecomment-394771642 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2216 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5NDc3MTY0Mg== | vnoel 731499 | 2018-06-05T16:19:38Z | 2018-06-05T16:19:38Z | CONTRIBUTOR | {
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
let the user specify figure dpi when plotting 329483009 | ||
| 371970858 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1719#issuecomment-371970858 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1719 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3MTk3MDg1OA== | vnoel 731499 | 2018-03-09T23:06:20Z | 2018-03-09T23:06:20Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Has this behavior been fixed by the change to NetCDF4 ? https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/issues/743 |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
open_mfdataset crashes when files are present with datasets of dimension = 0 274298111 | |
| 287099757 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1198#issuecomment-287099757 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1198 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4NzA5OTc1Nw== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-03-16T15:46:14Z | 2017-03-16T15:46:14Z | CONTRIBUTOR | with that keyword the open_mfdataset goes through ! my code crashes later because the data is too big to fit in memory, but that's another problem ;-) |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fixes OS error arising from too many files open 199900056 | |
| 287058651 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1198#issuecomment-287058651 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1198 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4NzA1ODY1MQ== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-03-16T13:37:05Z | 2017-03-16T13:37:05Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hey @pwolfram, I installed your branch and tried to I got the following:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fixes OS error arising from too many files open 199900056 | |
| 284435076 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1291#issuecomment-284435076 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1291 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4NDQzNTA3Ng== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-03-06T15:46:23Z | 2017-03-06T15:46:23Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I hope everything's ok now. Thanks for the hand-holding |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Guess the complementary dimension when only one is passed to pcolormesh 211391408 | |
| 283930759 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1291#issuecomment-283930759 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1291 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MzkzMDc1OQ== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-03-03T11:25:06Z | 2017-03-03T11:25:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Can anyone knowledgeable tell me how to fix the appveyor build? It's complaining of a failing |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Guess the complementary dimension when only one is passed to pcolormesh 211391408 | |
| 283694163 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1291#issuecomment-283694163 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1291 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MzY5NDE2Mw== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-03-02T15:59:49Z | 2017-03-02T16:51:10Z | CONTRIBUTOR | thanks ! Do we need to worry about the "appveyor" build fails? The failure seems to happen somewhere unrelated |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Guess the complementary dimension when only one is passed to pcolormesh 211391408 | |
| 283682931 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1291#issuecomment-283682931 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1291 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MzY4MjkzMQ== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-03-02T15:22:03Z | 2017-03-02T15:22:03Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I have added a couple of exceptions to the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Guess the complementary dimension when only one is passed to pcolormesh 211391408 | |
| 277969098 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1249#issuecomment-277969098 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1249 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3Nzk2OTA5OA== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-02-07T11:14:42Z | 2017-02-07T11:14:42Z | CONTRIBUTOR | ok, I see. In case there's a vote, I vote for raising an error in 1D too :-) |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
confusing dataset creation process 205414496 | |
| 277767832 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1249#issuecomment-277767832 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1249 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3Nzc2NzgzMg== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-02-06T18:22:08Z | 2017-02-06T18:22:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I don't understand the "raise an error" option. Would it mean that creating a Dataset with 1D arrays with no named dimension would raise an error? That would be very impractical. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
confusing dataset creation process 205414496 | |
| 277336569 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1247#issuecomment-277336569 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1247 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NzMzNjU2OQ== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-02-03T19:17:09Z | 2017-02-03T19:17:09Z | CONTRIBUTOR | you mean, within numpy? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
numpy function very slow on DataArray compared to DataArray.values 205215815 | |
| 277276242 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1198#issuecomment-277276242 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1198 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NzI3NjI0Mg== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-02-03T15:27:04Z | 2017-02-03T15:27:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'm just chiming in to signify my interest in seeing this issue solved. I have just hit "OSError: Too many open files". The data itself is not even huge, but it's scattered across many files and it's a PITA to revert to manual concatenation -- I've grown used to dask doing the work for me ;-) |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fixes OS error arising from too many files open 199900056 | |
| 272415578 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1205#issuecomment-272415578 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1205 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjQxNTU3OA== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-01-13T10:52:32Z | 2017-01-13T10:52:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | As it is, the xarray code becomes tied up with cartopy. If cartopy somehow changes its syntax (e.g. by renaming the Maybe there's another, more abstract way to do this? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
transfer projection to implied subplots when faceting 200593854 | |
| 272414593 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1205#issuecomment-272414593 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1205 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjQxNDU5Mw== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-01-13T10:47:28Z | 2017-01-13T10:47:28Z | CONTRIBUTOR | One concern I have is that it is conceivable that one might pass a |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
transfer projection to implied subplots when faceting 200593854 | |
| 272409178 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1201#issuecomment-272409178 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1201 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjQwOTE3OA== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-01-13T10:19:08Z | 2017-01-13T10:19:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I don't understand what you mean by 'adding you own to the signature'. Adding my own what to what signature? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
pass projection argument to plt.subplot when faceting with cartopy transform 200364693 | |
| 272395987 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1201#issuecomment-272395987 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1201 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjM5NTk4Nw== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-01-13T09:14:30Z | 2017-01-13T09:14:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I am confused. I planned to identify the plotting function that accepted the However it looks like no xarray code contains the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
pass projection argument to plt.subplot when faceting with cartopy transform 200364693 | |
| 272173661 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1202#issuecomment-272173661 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1202 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjE3MzY2MQ== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-01-12T14:16:29Z | 2017-01-12T14:16:29Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I have found in issue #604 a example of how to do this. I have submitted in issue #1203 a change to the docs. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
way to apply functions to subplots when faceting 200369077 | |
| 258854045 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1088#issuecomment-258854045 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1088 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1ODg1NDA0NQ== | vnoel 731499 | 2016-11-07T14:45:24Z | 2016-11-07T14:45:24Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I was briefly confused by the examples as at first they seemed to me to do nothing -- read data and forget it. This change prevents any similar confusion :-) |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
missing return value in sample function calls (I think) 187661575 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 11