issue_comments

Table actions

7 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and user = 11289391 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • StanczakDominik · 7 ✖

author_association 1

  • CONTRIBUTOR · 7 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
1110573524 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6515#issuecomment-1110573524 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6515 IC_kwDOAMm_X85CMgHU StanczakDominik 11289391 2022-04-27T05:55:39Z 2022-04-27T05:55:39Z CONTRIBUTOR

Gah, I kept grepping for curve_fit with the underscore! 😅 Thanks for the pointer!

 
{
    "total_count": 2,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 1,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 1,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Add allow_failures flag to Dataset.curve_fit 1215946244
1004196383 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6132#issuecomment-1004196383 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6132 IC_kwDOAMm_X8472tIf StanczakDominik 11289391 2022-01-03T16:11:20Z 2022-01-03T16:11:20Z CONTRIBUTOR

Well, I literally glanced just at the end of test_dataarray.py, which seemed like a sensible place for this to live, and, lo and behold, a test class 😄 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Check for just `...`, rather than `[...]` in `da.stack` 1092546388
808694777 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4118#issuecomment-808694777 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4118 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwODY5NDc3Nw== StanczakDominik 11289391 2021-03-27T08:55:26Z 2021-03-27T08:55:26Z CONTRIBUTOR

Whoa, that sounds awesome! Thanks for the heads up :) Definitely could be quite handy, looking forward to seeing how this develops. @rocco8773 this should be interesting for you as well :)

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Feature Request: Hierarchical storage and processing in xarray 628719058
733629234 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/525#issuecomment-733629234 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/525 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczMzYyOTIzNA== StanczakDominik 11289391 2020-11-25T10:48:57Z 2020-11-25T10:48:57Z CONTRIBUTOR

Hi! I'm just popping in as a very interested user of both xarray and unit packages to ask: since there's been some awesome progress made here and pint-xarray is now enough of A Thing to have documentation, though obviously experimental - how much work would you expect a corresponding package for astropy's Quantities to take, given the current state of things?

Are there any limitations that would prevent that? I saw the discussion above about Quantities being more problematic due to taking the subclass-from-numpy-arrays route, but I'm not sure how much of a roadblock that still is. I would suspect the API could be shared with pint-xarray (which, obviously, is experimental for now).

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   support for units 100295585
619763437 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3709#issuecomment-619763437 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3709 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxOTc2MzQzNw== StanczakDominik 11289391 2020-04-27T06:42:12Z 2020-04-27T06:42:12Z CONTRIBUTOR

That's amazing. This would single-handedly turn xarray from "nice to have, pretty useful" to "I recommend it to all my friends". I would absolutely love to be able to use it.

 
{
    "total_count": 2,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 2,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Feature Proposal: `xarray.interactive` module 552500673
488116448 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2556#issuecomment-488116448 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2556 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4ODExNjQ0OA== StanczakDominik 11289391 2019-04-30T21:08:38Z 2019-04-30T21:08:38Z CONTRIBUTOR

Hi, just popping in - perhaps rebasing on top of the master branch would help move this along?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Add transpose_coords option to DataArray.transpose 381518663
477574320 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1820#issuecomment-477574320 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1820 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3NzU3NDMyMA== StanczakDominik 11289391 2019-03-28T12:28:33Z 2019-03-28T12:28:33Z CONTRIBUTOR

I just came by to say that the attached sample notebook is very, very pretty, and I would love to see this line of work continue!

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   WIP: html repr 287844110

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);