issue_comments
7 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and user = 11289391 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- StanczakDominik · 7 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1110573524 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6515#issuecomment-1110573524 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6515 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85CMgHU | StanczakDominik 11289391 | 2022-04-27T05:55:39Z | 2022-04-27T05:55:39Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Gah, I kept grepping for |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 1, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 1, "eyes": 0 } |
Add allow_failures flag to Dataset.curve_fit 1215946244 | |
1004196383 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6132#issuecomment-1004196383 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6132 | IC_kwDOAMm_X8472tIf | StanczakDominik 11289391 | 2022-01-03T16:11:20Z | 2022-01-03T16:11:20Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Well, I literally glanced just at the end of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Check for just `...`, rather than `[...]` in `da.stack` 1092546388 | |
808694777 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4118#issuecomment-808694777 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4118 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwODY5NDc3Nw== | StanczakDominik 11289391 | 2021-03-27T08:55:26Z | 2021-03-27T08:55:26Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Whoa, that sounds awesome! Thanks for the heads up :) Definitely could be quite handy, looking forward to seeing how this develops. @rocco8773 this should be interesting for you as well :) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature Request: Hierarchical storage and processing in xarray 628719058 | |
733629234 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/525#issuecomment-733629234 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/525 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczMzYyOTIzNA== | StanczakDominik 11289391 | 2020-11-25T10:48:57Z | 2020-11-25T10:48:57Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hi! I'm just popping in as a very interested user of both xarray and unit packages to ask: since there's been some awesome progress made here and pint-xarray is now enough of A Thing to have documentation, though obviously experimental - how much work would you expect a corresponding package for astropy's Quantities to take, given the current state of things? Are there any limitations that would prevent that? I saw the discussion above about Quantities being more problematic due to taking the subclass-from-numpy-arrays route, but I'm not sure how much of a roadblock that still is. I would suspect the API could be shared with pint-xarray (which, obviously, is experimental for now). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
support for units 100295585 | |
619763437 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3709#issuecomment-619763437 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3709 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxOTc2MzQzNw== | StanczakDominik 11289391 | 2020-04-27T06:42:12Z | 2020-04-27T06:42:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | That's amazing. This would single-handedly turn xarray from "nice to have, pretty useful" to "I recommend it to all my friends". I would absolutely love to be able to use it. |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 2, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature Proposal: `xarray.interactive` module 552500673 | |
488116448 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2556#issuecomment-488116448 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2556 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4ODExNjQ0OA== | StanczakDominik 11289391 | 2019-04-30T21:08:38Z | 2019-04-30T21:08:38Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hi, just popping in - perhaps rebasing on top of the master branch would help move this along? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add transpose_coords option to DataArray.transpose 381518663 | |
477574320 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1820#issuecomment-477574320 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1820 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3NzU3NDMyMA== | StanczakDominik 11289391 | 2019-03-28T12:28:33Z | 2019-03-28T12:28:33Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I just came by to say that the attached sample notebook is very, very pretty, and I would love to see this line of work continue! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
WIP: html repr 287844110 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 7