issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and issue = 956103236 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Duck array compatibility meeting · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
924108418 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5648#issuecomment-924108418 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5648 | IC_kwDOAMm_X843FMaC | jacobtomlinson 1610850 | 2021-09-21T15:37:12Z | 2021-09-21T15:38:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I can be there! @jakirkham and @pentschev are also Dask maintainers so there should be good representation. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Duck array compatibility meeting 956103236 | |
890191588 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5648#issuecomment-890191588 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5648 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841Dz7k | pentschev 4398246 | 2021-07-30T22:04:51Z | 2021-07-30T22:04:51Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'm also happy to join the meeting. Thanks @TomNicholas for the initiative here and @jacobtomlinson for tagging me. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Duck array compatibility meeting 956103236 | |
890165626 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5648#issuecomment-890165626 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5648 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841Dtl6 | jthielen 3460034 | 2021-07-30T21:34:32Z | 2021-07-30T21:41:41Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Count me in for the meeting! Here are a few suggestions about possible topics to add to the agenda (based on linked issues/discussions), if we can fit it all in:
Also, tagging a few other array type libraries and maintainers/contributors who may be interested (please ping the relevant folks if you know them):
(interesting side note is the first three of these are all ndarray subclasses right now...perhaps discussing the interplay between array subclassing and wrapping is in order too?) |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Duck array compatibility meeting 956103236 | |
889909886 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5648#issuecomment-889909886 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5648 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841CvJ- | jacobtomlinson 1610850 | 2021-07-30T13:55:56Z | 2021-07-30T13:55:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Happy to attend. It might also be useful to have @pentschev involved too. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Duck array compatibility meeting 956103236 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3