issue_comments
7 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and issue = 671609109 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- General curve fitting method · 7 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
770133047 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4300#issuecomment-770133047 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4300 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3MDEzMzA0Nw== | slevang 39069044 | 2021-01-30T01:38:18Z | 2021-01-30T01:38:18Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I needed this functionality for a project, and piggy-backing off the last couple of comments decided the |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 2, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
General curve fitting method 671609109 | |
677666962 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4300#issuecomment-677666962 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4300 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3NzY2Njk2Mg== | clausmichele 31700619 | 2020-08-20T13:32:33Z | 2020-08-20T13:40:07Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
@AndrewWilliams3142 I've tried to extend this to a 3d matrix (timeseries of 2d matrices) using Dask, it seems to work! Have a look here https://gist.github.com/clausmichele/8350e1f7f15e6828f29579914276de71 |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
General curve fitting method 671609109 | |
673593388 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4300#issuecomment-673593388 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4300 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MzU5MzM4OA== | AndrewILWilliams 56925856 | 2020-08-13T16:59:30Z | 2020-08-13T16:59:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR | cheers @TomNicholas , that's helpful. :) I've started messing with the idea in this Gist if you want to have a look. It's pretty hacky at the moment, but might be helpful as a testbed. (And a way of getting my head around how |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
General curve fitting method 671609109 | |
672084619 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4300#issuecomment-672084619 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4300 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MjA4NDYxOQ== | AndrewILWilliams 56925856 | 2020-08-11T16:49:00Z | 2020-08-11T16:49:29Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @TomNicholas I'm a bit confused about how the Edit: It's been a hot day here, so apologies if this turns out to be a dumb q haha |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
General curve fitting method 671609109 | |
671442450 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4300#issuecomment-671442450 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4300 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MTQ0MjQ1MA== | AndrewILWilliams 56925856 | 2020-08-10T16:01:06Z | 2020-08-10T16:01:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This sounds very cool! :) I'm not sure that I have much to add, but given @aulemahal 's good point about the complexity of rewriting Alternatively, given that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
General curve fitting method 671609109 | |
669065910 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4300#issuecomment-669065910 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4300 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY2OTA2NTkxMA== | clausmichele 31700619 | 2020-08-05T08:44:06Z | 2020-08-05T08:44:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I am also trying to get similar results of scipy curve_fit with xarray and dask. Is there a workaround I can use to fit a sinusoidal function with the current functions/methods?
This is the function I use to fit a seasonal trend with scipy:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
General curve fitting method 671609109 | |
668264540 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4300#issuecomment-668264540 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4300 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY2ODI2NDU0MA== | aulemahal 20629530 | 2020-08-03T22:05:25Z | 2020-08-03T22:05:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR | My comments
Q.1 : For now Q.3 : For simple directly declared function, inspect does a good job, but it can get tricky with wrapped functions, which might arise in more complex workflows. Could we have a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
General curve fitting method 671609109 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4