issue_comments
8 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR", issue = 571743567 and user = 29958771 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Coarsen keep attrs 3376 · 8 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 592964963 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3801#issuecomment-592964963 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3801 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5Mjk2NDk2Mw== | amcnicho 29958771 | 2020-02-29T16:49:25Z | 2020-02-29T16:49:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
That's right. The original test used test_reduce_keep_attrs as a template. Now, instead of defining one Variable object and passing it to both test conditions, a new Variable is defined and coarsened to check each setting of the global option. I will merge master in and add similar tests for |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Coarsen keep attrs 3376 571743567 | |
| 592802437 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3801#issuecomment-592802437 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3801 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5MjgwMjQzNw== | amcnicho 29958771 | 2020-02-29T01:21:25Z | 2020-02-29T01:21:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The recent changes I made to both the code and the tests result in a pass condition for both the dataset and variable version of test_coarsen_keep_attrs. I think adding the keep_attrs keyword argument to the Note that there are at least two failure modes remaining:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Coarsen keep attrs 3376 571743567 | |
| 592763573 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3801#issuecomment-592763573 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3801 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5Mjc2MzU3Mw== | amcnicho 29958771 | 2020-02-28T22:44:41Z | 2020-02-28T22:44:41Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thank you for the review, I’ll incorporate those changes.
No, the dataset test still raises |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Coarsen keep attrs 3376 571743567 | |
| 592280108 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3801#issuecomment-592280108 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3801 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5MjI4MDEwOA== | amcnicho 29958771 | 2020-02-28T02:29:03Z | 2020-02-28T02:29:03Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Sorry, I changed this from a draft to ready for review accidentally, and it doesn't look like there is a way to reverse that operation. The tests still fail after this latest change, but I think we are converging on a fix. The variable.coarsen method is applied to each of the arrays inside |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Coarsen keep attrs 3376 571743567 | |
| 592275751 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3801#issuecomment-592275751 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3801 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5MjI3NTc1MQ== | amcnicho 29958771 | 2020-02-28T02:11:30Z | 2020-02-28T02:11:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
I couldn't find a test that checks attribute persistence across rolling window operations, but when I tested it interactively e.g.
it still doesn't seem to work. I agree that it is better to focus on
Yes, I seem not to have included the assignment, or it got lost along the way. I added it with a new commit. Thank you for noticing that.
I think I see now. |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 1,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Coarsen keep attrs 3376 571743567 | |
| 592157343 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3801#issuecomment-592157343 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3801 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5MjE1NzM0Mw== | amcnicho 29958771 | 2020-02-27T20:17:56Z | 2020-02-27T20:17:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | It appears to be the mean function operating on the coarsen object xarray/tests/test_dataset.py#l.5676. The FWIW the dataset object returned by that call in the test looks like this:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Coarsen keep attrs 3376 571743567 | |
| 592137938 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3801#issuecomment-592137938 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3801 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5MjEzNzkzOA== | amcnicho 29958771 | 2020-02-27T19:32:54Z | 2020-02-27T19:32:54Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Coarsen keep attrs 3376 571743567 | |
| 592135306 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3801#issuecomment-592135306 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3801 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5MjEzNTMwNg== | amcnicho 29958771 | 2020-02-27T19:27:05Z | 2020-02-27T19:27:05Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I added code to pass the keyword through and handle it in the constructor of the This function
makes me suspicious that this keep_attrs keyword shouldn't be reaching this section of the code though. Any guidance would be appreciated. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Coarsen keep attrs 3376 571743567 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1