issue_comments
7 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and issue = 411755105 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Improved default behavior when concatenating DataArrays · 7 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
469067311 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-469067311 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2OTA2NzMxMQ== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2019-03-03T21:41:21Z | 2019-03-03T21:41:21Z | CONTRIBUTOR | No objection to going with #2792; I'm just happy to have the change merged 😄 It would be nice for someone to cherry-pick 63da214d697345ebdd0ecc0967c72eafc70bcb0d before releasing 0.12 though, just to fix that warning. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improved default behavior when concatenating DataArrays 411755105 | |
467667604 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-467667604 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NzY2NzYwNA== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2019-02-27T00:07:34Z | 2019-02-27T00:07:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
...yep, an unmatched paren. 😥
I think it's impossible to avoid this when using inference in the general case. Two options I think would be decent-if-unsatisfying:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improved default behavior when concatenating DataArrays 411755105 | |
466587431 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-466587431 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NjU4NzQzMQ== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2019-02-22T23:47:30Z | 2019-02-22T23:47:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @shoyer - don't worry about the docs build, I'm pretty sure that was just a flaky network from Travis and it's working now in any case. I've left |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improved default behavior when concatenating DataArrays 411755105 | |
466369284 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-466369284 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NjM2OTI4NA== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2019-02-22T11:41:37Z | 2019-02-22T11:41:37Z | CONTRIBUTOR | OK! @shoyer, I've got everything passing and it's ready for review. Even the accidental tutorial/docs fixes :smile: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improved default behavior when concatenating DataArrays 411755105 | |
465812738 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-465812738 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NTgxMjczOA== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2019-02-21T00:32:10Z | 2019-02-21T00:32:10Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hmm, it looks like the failure to download the naturalearth coastlines.zip wasn't so transient after all - but it does work on my machine! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improved default behavior when concatenating DataArrays 411755105 | |
465802643 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-465802643 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NTgwMjY0Mw== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2019-02-20T23:51:04Z | 2019-02-20T23:51:15Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The docs build failed due to a (transient) http error when loading tutorial data for the docs, so I've also finalised the planned conversion from |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improved default behavior when concatenating DataArrays 411755105 | |
465029759 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-465029759 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NTAyOTc1OQ== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2019-02-19T08:11:56Z | 2019-02-19T08:11:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks for the support and quick review @shoyer! Any idea when Xarray 0.12 might be out? I'm teaching some remote sensing workshops in mid-March and would love to have this merged, as a colleague's review of those notebooks prompted this PR 😄 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improved default behavior when concatenating DataArrays 411755105 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1