home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

6 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and issue = 287844110 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 3

  • jsignell 3
  • Carreau 2
  • StanczakDominik 1

issue 1

  • WIP: html repr · 6 ✖

author_association 1

  • CONTRIBUTOR · 6 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
544676254 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1820#issuecomment-544676254 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1820 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NDY3NjI1NA== jsignell 4806877 2019-10-21T19:44:52Z 2019-10-21T19:44:52Z CONTRIBUTOR

The last fiddle and this PR seem fairly different. Does the fiddle have the most up-to-date hierarchy or is it just somewhere where people were playing around with ideas (in which case I should see what is improved and try to pull those bits of css)?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  WIP: html repr 287844110
543363463 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1820#issuecomment-543363463 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1820 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MzM2MzQ2Mw== jsignell 4806877 2019-10-17T21:10:56Z 2019-10-17T21:10:56Z CONTRIBUTOR

Ok thanks! I'll get cracking :)

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  WIP: html repr 287844110
542766063 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1820#issuecomment-542766063 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1820 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0Mjc2NjA2Mw== jsignell 4806877 2019-10-16T15:45:56Z 2019-10-16T15:45:56Z CONTRIBUTOR

Is there anything that I can do to help get this PR in? Are the items on the TODO list prioritized? One minor comment is that in terms of style for overflow, it might be more legible if the var_names were bolded on hover (fiddle), although that might make them look clickable.

{
    "total_count": 4,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 4,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  WIP: html repr 287844110
511236366 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1820#issuecomment-511236366 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1820 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMTIzNjM2Ng== Carreau 335567 2019-07-14T21:21:50Z 2019-07-14T21:21:50Z CONTRIBUTOR

Sidenote: the css is not injected at load time when the notebook is not trusted, so the REPRs may looked garbled.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  WIP: html repr 287844110
511236136 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1820#issuecomment-511236136 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1820 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMTIzNjEzNg== Carreau 335567 2019-07-14T21:18:08Z 2019-07-14T21:18:08Z CONTRIBUTOR

I'm just starting to look at this, was there any experiment with the html "detail" and "summary" pairs ?

They are made to do collapsible sections, and will likely allow to get rid of (some of) the UUID logic.

Here is a full example of a summary section. ``` %%html

<style> details[open] >summary > .info{ display:none; } </style>
Coordinate (hidden when expanded): Your actual nested content.

```

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  WIP: html repr 287844110
477574320 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1820#issuecomment-477574320 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1820 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3NzU3NDMyMA== StanczakDominik 11289391 2019-03-28T12:28:33Z 2019-03-28T12:28:33Z CONTRIBUTOR

I just came by to say that the attached sample notebook is very, very pretty, and I would love to see this line of work continue!

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  WIP: html repr 287844110

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 13.641ms · About: xarray-datasette