issue_comments

Table actions

4 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR", issue = 1423321834 and user = 90008 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • hmaarrfk · 4 ✖

issue 1

  • Actually make the fast code path return early for Aligner.align · 4 ✖

author_association 1

  • CONTRIBUTOR · 4 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
1293689561 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7222#issuecomment-1293689561 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7222 IC_kwDOAMm_X85NHCLZ hmaarrfk 90008 2022-10-27T15:15:45Z 2022-10-27T15:15:45Z CONTRIBUTOR

but that would be a lot of work especially for such a critical piece of code in Xarray.

Agreed. I'll take the small wins where I can :D.

Great! I think this will be a good addition with: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7223#discussion_r1007023769

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Actually make the fast code path return early for Aligner.align 1423321834
1291405225 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7222#issuecomment-1291405225 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7222 IC_kwDOAMm_X85M-Uep hmaarrfk 90008 2022-10-26T02:19:23Z 2022-10-26T02:19:23Z CONTRIBUTOR

I think the rapid return, helps by about 40% is still pretty good.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Actually make the fast code path return early for Aligner.align 1423321834
1291402576 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7222#issuecomment-1291402576 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7222 IC_kwDOAMm_X85M-T1Q hmaarrfk 90008 2022-10-26T02:17:45Z 2022-10-26T02:17:45Z CONTRIBUTOR

hmm ok. it seems i can't blatently avoid the copy like that.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Actually make the fast code path return early for Aligner.align 1423321834
1291391647 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7222#issuecomment-1291391647 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7222 IC_kwDOAMm_X85M-RKf hmaarrfk 90008 2022-10-26T02:03:41Z 2022-10-26T02:03:41Z CONTRIBUTOR

The reason this is a separate merge request, is that I agree that this is more contentious as a change.

However, I will argue that Aligner should really not be a class.

Using ripgrep you find that the only instances of Aligner exist internally: ` xarray/core/dataset.py 2775: aligner: alignment.Aligner, 2783: """Callback called fromAligner`` to create a new reindexed Dataset."""

xarray/core/alignment.py 107:class Aligner(Generic[DataAlignable]): 114: aligner = Aligner(objects, *kwargs) <------- Example 767: aligner = Aligner( <----------- Used and consumed for the method align 881: aligner = Aligner( <----------- Used and consumed for the method reindex 909: # This check is not performed in Aligner.

xarray/core/dataarray.py 1752: aligner: alignment.Aligner, 1760: """Callback called from Aligner to create a new reindexed DataArray.""" ```

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Actually make the fast code path return early for Aligner.align 1423321834

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);