issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and issue = 1108564253 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Xarray versioning to switch to CalVer · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1057653294 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6176#issuecomment-1057653294 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6176 | IC_kwDOAMm_X84_CoIu | brews 2049051 | 2022-03-03T04:24:14Z | 2022-03-03T04:24:14Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Using semver can be handy to signal breaking changes. Any thoughts on how xarray will handle breaking changes with calver? Any release can break, or during select periods, after a timeout, etc.? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray versioning to switch to CalVer 1108564253 | |
1020681788 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6176#issuecomment-1020681788 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6176 | IC_kwDOAMm_X8481l48 | jrbourbeau 11656932 | 2022-01-25T00:19:49Z | 2022-01-25T01:27:00Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Thanks for the ping @Illviljan. Zero-padding dates did come up in the Dask calver discussion starting here https://github.com/dask/community/issues/100#issuecomment-704445214. In a nutshell, there was a slight preference towards using zero-padding (i.e. As pointed out https://github.com/dask/community/issues/100#issuecomment-704468187 either convention is valid from a Python packaging perspective. FWIW I'm not aware of any issues that have come up from Dask using a zero-padded version number. The main thing that comes to mind is when checking out git tags for a specific release (e.g. EDIT: To be clear, I'm not advocating for one convention over the other -- just providing context around Dask's decision |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray versioning to switch to CalVer 1108564253 | |
1020669305 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6176#issuecomment-1020669305 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6176 | IC_kwDOAMm_X8481i15 | ksunden 2501846 | 2022-01-24T23:57:13Z | 2022-01-24T23:57:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
I did I do understand the appeal of leading zeros, I started off using them myself, but pypi/setuptools/etc will bring in inconsistencies that you will either need to fight against or give into the consistent way, which is sans leading zero (that is the path I chose) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray versioning to switch to CalVer 1108564253 | |
1020405910 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6176#issuecomment-1020405910 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6176 | IC_kwDOAMm_X8480iiW | ksunden 2501846 | 2022-01-24T18:23:26Z | 2022-01-24T18:23:26Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Note that PEP 440 normalizes integers in version strings, so leading zeros are ignored and the version as it appears in PyPI would be On my own packages which I use calver for I have opted to not have leading zeros such that the "canonical" version matches the "normalized" version to avoid any confusion that may cause. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray versioning to switch to CalVer 1108564253 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3