issue_comments
12 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and issue = 1076265104 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Weighted quantile · 12 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1047254700 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-1047254700 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X84-a9as | huard 81219 | 2022-02-21T21:59:22Z | 2022-02-21T21:59:22Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The alignment of data and weights is not done automatically. So I agree this would be ideal, but I'll need some guidance to make it happen without the This is the error I get
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 | |
1043394963 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-1043394963 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X84-MPGT | huard 81219 | 2022-02-17T20:26:50Z | 2022-02-17T20:26:50Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @mathause I'm not 100% confident the methods other than linear work as expected, so I suggest we do not expose |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 | |
1043334868 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-1043334868 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X84-MAbU | cjauvin 488992 | 2022-02-17T19:27:23Z | 2022-02-17T19:27:23Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I have added a test to verify that using equal weights with the different interpolation methods that this PR supports would work (i.e. would yield the same results as |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 | |
1035083891 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-1035083891 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849siBz | huard 81219 | 2022-02-10T15:52:34Z | 2022-02-10T15:52:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR | We have local changes that expose Do you want us to push those changes here ? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 | |
1033607850 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-1033607850 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849m5qq | bzah 16700639 | 2022-02-09T10:30:40Z | 2022-02-09T10:40:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @mathause This PR goes beyond what is currently implemented in numpy. For now, all weighted quantiles PR on numpy are more or less based on "linear" method (method 7) and none have been merged. I plan to work on integrating weights with the other interpolation methods but don't have the time right now. I'll probably pick some ideas from here. As for the numerics here, everything looks good to me.
The only limitations I can see are:
- This only handles sampling weights, which is fine I guess.
- Some interpolation methods are missing, they can be added later.
- ~A |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 | |
1032858964 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-1032858964 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849kC1U | huard 81219 | 2022-02-08T17:13:14Z | 2022-02-08T17:13:14Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Correct, it's not exposed yet because I don't have the bandwidth to create tests for all the different methods. The equal weight case could be tested against numpy fairly easily though. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 | |
1032829729 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-1032829729 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849j7sh | huard 81219 | 2022-02-08T16:44:21Z | 2022-02-08T16:44:21Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @mathause Should this PR be amended to account for #6108 ? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 | |
1021975396 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-1021975396 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X8486htk | bzah 16700639 | 2022-01-26T08:32:56Z | 2022-02-07T16:57:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | FYI, weighted quantiles topic will be discussed in numpy's triage meeting of today (17:00 UTC). I'm not a maintainer but I'm sure you are welcomed to join in if you are interested. Meeting information: https://hackmd.io/68i_JvOYQfy9ERiHgXMPvg |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 | |
1011450968 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-1011450968 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X848SYRY | huard 81219 | 2022-01-12T21:06:01Z | 2022-01-12T21:06:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I had the same interrogation. My guess is that the The way I see it is that another PR would bring the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 | |
1011136209 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-1011136209 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X848RLbR | cjauvin 488992 | 2022-01-12T15:03:31Z | 2022-01-12T15:03:31Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @huard's latest commit modifies the algorithm so that it uses Kish's effective sample size, as described in the blog where the algorithm comes from: https://aakinshin.net/posts/kish-ess-weighted-quantiles/, which seems to solve the problem mentioned by @mathause. Also he adds support for the interpolation types 4 to 9 (those that share a common way of computing |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 | |
992713850 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-992713850 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X847K5x6 | cjauvin 488992 | 2021-12-13T17:39:03Z | 2021-12-13T17:39:03Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @mathause About this:
My latest commit should fix (and test) this. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 | |
991714854 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-991714854 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X847HF4m | cjauvin 488992 | 2021-12-11T17:08:55Z | 2021-12-11T17:08:55Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @mathause Thanks for the many excellent suggestions! After having removed the
At first I thought that something like this could work:
The problem however is that it turns out that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3