issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 466444738 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- auto_combine warnings with open_mfdataset · 6 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 510883034 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3091#issuecomment-510883034 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3091 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMDg4MzAzNA== | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2019-07-12T13:18:34Z | 2019-07-12T13:18:34Z | MEMBER | Okay have a look at PR #3101. It will now issue a function-specific warning depending on if you enter from
It links to this page of the docs. This is controlled by a hidden Then it issues the same set of warnings as before, whose exact form depends on the structure of the users input. This could be improved further, but I think this should already be much clearer than before. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
auto_combine warnings with open_mfdataset 466444738 | |
| 510565507 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3091#issuecomment-510565507 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3091 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMDU2NTUwNw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-07-11T16:48:17Z | 2019-07-11T16:48:17Z | MEMBER | I think that would be OK.
Another option - more work but better - is to raise a single warning in I'd generally weigh towards less tax on people making changes, even if the user experience is a bit worse temporarily. So in this case I would vote to do whatever you're happy to do quickly @TomNicholas |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
auto_combine warnings with open_mfdataset 466444738 | |
| 510558970 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3091#issuecomment-510558970 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3091 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMDU1ODk3MA== | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2019-07-11T16:30:12Z | 2019-07-11T16:30:12Z | MEMBER | Okay fair points. From an implementation point of view it makes sense to raise one warning just saying that function will be deprecated/have deprecated behaviour, then immediately raise further warnings with details as to what to do. (Otherwise you'll have to start secretly passing partial warning message strings into auto_combine, which is possible but seems clunky.) If I do that so it specifically refers to open_mfdataset in the first warning, then gives a (better) generic explanation in the second, do you think that would be sufficient? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
auto_combine warnings with open_mfdataset 466444738 | |
| 510555912 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3091#issuecomment-510555912 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3091 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMDU1NTkxMg== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-07-11T16:22:27Z | 2019-07-11T16:22:27Z | MEMBER | I don't use the function but so as an outsider: all the information is there, but it took me a few reads through to understand it. Depending on how widely used this is, I think something like this would be clearer (h/t to similar pandas' warnings):
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
auto_combine warnings with open_mfdataset 466444738 | |
| 510554824 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3091#issuecomment-510554824 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3091 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMDU1NDgyNA== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-07-11T16:19:33Z | 2019-07-11T16:19:33Z | MEMBER | When calling |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
auto_combine warnings with open_mfdataset 466444738 | |
| 510535887 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3091#issuecomment-510535887 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3091 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMDUzNTg4Nw== | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2019-07-11T15:31:46Z | 2019-07-11T15:32:05Z | MEMBER |
Why? Do you feel it's not clear enough? The warning is to indicate that the current behaviour of To understand why a deprecation cycle would be required read from here (but it is long and confusing and the function names change so happy to explain the logic again if you want). |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
auto_combine warnings with open_mfdataset 466444738 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3