issue_comments
3 rows where issue = 377356113 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- full_like, ones_like, zeros_like should retain subclasses · 3 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1453094468 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2542#issuecomment-1453094468 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2542 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85WnHZE | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2023-03-03T07:27:48Z | 2023-03-03T07:27:48Z | MEMBER | See #3980 - this issue should be solved as part of #3980, but see that issue for more general discussion of subclassing. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
full_like, ones_like, zeros_like should retain subclasses 377356113 | |
| 706795159 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2542#issuecomment-706795159 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2542 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNjc5NTE1OQ== | stale[bot] 26384082 | 2020-10-12T00:30:43Z | 2020-10-12T00:30:43Z | NONE | In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity If this issue remains relevant, please comment here or remove the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
full_like, ones_like, zeros_like should retain subclasses 377356113 | |
| 436279947 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2542#issuecomment-436279947 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2542 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNjI3OTk0Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-11-06T14:53:11Z | 2018-11-06T14:53:11Z | MEMBER | Are there other functions where we don't do this? I would be happy to accept a fix here. I don't think we need a few keyword argument -- I expect most subclass users would consider this a bug rather than a feature. We might consider adding an official subclassing APIs like pandas: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/extending.html#extending-subclassing-pandas |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
full_like, ones_like, zeros_like should retain subclasses 377356113 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3