home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

pull_requests

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for pull_requests

5 rows where user = 23625371

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: draft, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date), merged_at (date)

id ▼ node_id number state locked title user body created_at updated_at closed_at merged_at merge_commit_sha assignee milestone draft head base author_association auto_merge repo url merged_by
501996625 MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTAxOTk2NjI1 4506 closed 0 Decoding year 1 time znicholls 23625371 <!-- Feel free to remove check-list items aren't relevant to your change --> - [x] Closes #4422 - [x] Tests added - [x] Passes `isort . && black . && mypy . && flake8` - [x] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in `whats-new.rst` - [x] Decision on whether to raise a warning or not when padding is performed 2020-10-13T05:38:58Z 2020-10-26T10:15:13Z 2020-10-26T09:50:18Z 2020-10-26T09:50:18Z adc55ac4d2883e0c6647f3983c3322ca2c690514     0 7ef15fe08837e4a21ab41fee14b33032bc28d27c 1597e3a91eaf96626725987d23bbda2a80d2bae7 CONTRIBUTOR   xarray 13221727 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4506  
595205842 MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTk1MjA1ODQy 5050 closed 0 BUG: Future time decoding znicholls 23625371 - [x] Tests added - [x] Passes `pre-commit run --all-files` - [x] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in `whats-new.rst` This identifies (and hopefully soon fixes) an issue with decoding times that are way into the future. Without re-introducing a change made in #4684, the test fails (see https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5050/checks?check_run_id=2136824754). With the change put back in, the test passes (see https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5050/checks?check_run_id=2136892412). @spencerkclark can I ask for your help on this one please? It seems that the removal in #4684 caused this case (which wasn't tested) to break in v0.17 and it's unclear to me where the fix should be (I'm guessing pandas from the discussions in #4684...). 2021-03-18T04:31:31Z 2021-03-18T14:04:09Z 2021-03-18T14:03:59Z 2021-03-18T14:03:59Z fbd48d4307502f7dbe8afa37b84df59e74407820     0 5c75f66ae670c06131a2bc3763d5bf13453b156f a6f51c680f4e4c3ed5101b9c1111f0b94d28a781 CONTRIBUTOR   xarray 13221727 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5050  
631050680 MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NjMxMDUwNjgw 5264 closed 0 Numpy string coding znicholls 23625371 Fixes handling of numpy string types in coding - [x] Tests added - [x] Passes `pre-commit run --all-files` - [x] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in `whats-new.rst` 2021-05-06T02:35:55Z 2021-12-30T23:40:28Z 2021-12-30T23:39:55Z 2021-12-30T23:39:55Z f75c3be583db377e1efe0fb90ece11e79bb4297e     0 e450cd2db0a9445d4a915fb0144ee6c5a234a65d f85ec665940291c9ac368f5e1b8a0711e2d9952d CONTRIBUTOR   xarray 13221727 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5264  
727340089 MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NzI3MzQwMDg5 5767 closed 0 Open mfdataset with long time axis znicholls 23625371 When `open_mfdataset` is used on files which have a long time axis, sometimes one time axis is cast to `pd.Timestamp` whilst the other is cast to `cftime.datetime`. In such a case, xarray thinks the time co-ordinates are different and won't load and combine the files automatically. This PR identifies this issue. I've also put in a hack solution but there must be a better way to handle this edge case. - [x] Tests added - [ ] Passes `pre-commit run --all-files` - [x] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in `whats-new.rst` 2021-09-05T05:18:14Z 2021-09-08T01:06:31Z 2021-09-08T01:06:31Z   a0709c341cecf324ff88b55c354945a54cb60d7e     1 548644aad9bd289258d666a98e668b16a7e45cc6 6a29380008dcd790f9adfbc290affcb767c913b2 CONTRIBUTOR   xarray 13221727 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5767  
729093736 MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NzI5MDkzNzM2 5776 closed 0 Update combine error znicholls 23625371 The update points users in the direction of the `use_cftime` argument, which can solve issues where calendars are decoded into different time classes (see also the discussion in #5767) - [x] Tests added - [x] Passes `pre-commit run --all-files` - [x] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in `whats-new.rst` 2021-09-08T01:05:38Z 2021-09-27T15:14:49Z 2021-09-27T14:43:15Z 2021-09-27T14:43:15Z 19ab40ee401187e8a4b255d1082beb4f36b7ab24     0 ec2657bfc1a426aa3559243b02ecf48de6673506 ed94afbd5398e208762bce3341ab7fb0fbc1977d CONTRIBUTOR   xarray 13221727 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5776  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [pull_requests] (
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [number] INTEGER,
   [state] TEXT,
   [locked] INTEGER,
   [title] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [body] TEXT,
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [closed_at] TEXT,
   [merged_at] TEXT,
   [merge_commit_sha] TEXT,
   [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]),
   [draft] INTEGER,
   [head] TEXT,
   [base] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [auto_merge] TEXT,
   [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]),
   [url] TEXT,
   [merged_by] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_pull_requests_merged_by]
    ON [pull_requests] ([merged_by]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_pull_requests_repo]
    ON [pull_requests] ([repo]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_pull_requests_milestone]
    ON [pull_requests] ([milestone]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_pull_requests_assignee]
    ON [pull_requests] ([assignee]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_pull_requests_user]
    ON [pull_requests] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 20.761ms · About: xarray-datasette