pull_requests: 547841798
This data as json
id | node_id | number | state | locked | title | user | body | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | merged_at | merge_commit_sha | assignee | milestone | draft | head | base | author_association | auto_merge | repo | url | merged_by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
547841798 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTQ3ODQxNzk4 | 4753 | closed | 0 | Replace SortedKeysDict with dict | 5635139 | <!-- Feel free to remove check-list items aren't relevant to your change --> - [x] Tests added - [x] Passes `isort . && black . && mypy . && flake8` - [x] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in `whats-new.rst` Inspired by @mathause research in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4571#issuecomment-724848270 Note that one test is removed: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/compare/master...max-sixty:sorted-keys?expand=1#diff-2db7f6624707083db4aaab1b62eb11352200ec9d3ac1055de84877912226d7b5L560 While I'm keen on simplifying the data structures, this may have some unforeseen consequences, and at least deserves some thought re how we handle differently ordered dims. Currently this PR retains the sorting in reprs. | 2021-01-03T07:02:39Z | 2021-05-19T19:30:19Z | 2021-05-19T19:29:31Z | 2021-05-19T19:29:30Z | 5a602cd387a638742239aabfabef640bed0ced0e | 0 | a8cec8cd3f6c47dcbd2c40e4230848aeffbdf89c | b1bd6c8236cc070d3cdece0b52746825b4c280cd | MEMBER | 13221727 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4753 |
Links from other tables
- 1 row from pull_requests_id in labels_pull_requests