pull_requests: 151232906
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | state | locked | title | user | body | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | merged_at | merge_commit_sha | assignee | milestone | draft | head | base | author_association | auto_merge | repo | url | merged_by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 151232906 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTUxMjMyOTA2 | 1696 | closed | 0 | ffill & bfill methods | 5635139 | - [x] Closes #1651 - [x] Tests added / passed - [ ] Passes ``git diff upstream/master **/*py | flake8 --diff`` - [ ] Fully documented, including `whats-new.rst` for all changes and `api.rst` for new API No docs / docstrings. No backfill. But otherwise is this a reasonable layout? Do we prefer `fillna` with options (back / forward / replacement), or `ffill`, `bfill`, `fillna`? | 2017-11-07T21:32:19Z | 2017-11-12T00:14:33Z | 2017-11-12T00:14:29Z | 8c8003fcfcc8c2d0f27712fd795817d403a9012b | 0 | 3c9359cb17820be76f25d09c9a987236a7a7d40f | fb6e13ec15e85bbeceedbcd754e063f6e5696bf7 | MEMBER | 13221727 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1696 |
Links from other tables
- 0 rows from pull_requests_id in labels_pull_requests