pull_requests: 1046326317
This data as json
id | node_id | number | state | locked | title | user | body | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | merged_at | merge_commit_sha | assignee | milestone | draft | head | base | author_association | auto_merge | repo | url | merged_by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1046326317 | PR_kwDOAMm_X84-Xawt | 6988 | closed | 0 | Simplify datetime64 `dt.calendar` tests | 6628425 | This PR simplifies the tests for the calendar attribute on the `dt` accessor when using a `datetime64[ns]`-dtype DataArray. Instead of creating random-valued datetime arrays, we can use arrays of zeros (i.e. 1970-01-01), since the values of the datetimes should not be relevant to these tests (only their type matters). I suspect this should address #6906, because it eliminates the need to convert to `datetime64[ns]`, though I still feel as though there is a more fundamental pandas issue lurking there. | 2022-09-05T12:39:30Z | 2022-09-09T09:50:55Z | 2022-09-08T23:34:44Z | 2022-09-08T23:34:43Z | 77d961a8c43444e16b51e9700e7805a9e7e0d190 | 0 | 0f9566c4f28372e4dc5ecd77196fe0a929e513c3 | 18454c218002e48e1643ce8e25654262e5f592ad | MEMBER | 13221727 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6988 |
Links from other tables
- 0 rows from pull_requests_id in labels_pull_requests