issues
2 rows where type = "pull" and user = 42680748 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2060883540 | PR_kwDOAMm_X85i-ZWI | 8577 | Interpolate na: Fix #7665 and introduce arguments similar to pandas | Ockenfuss 42680748 | open | 0 | 0 | 2023-12-30T23:28:47Z | 2023-12-30T23:28:47Z | CONTRIBUTOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/8577 |
This is an attempt to close #7665 and combine the current possibilities from xarray (max_gap) and pandas (limit_direction, limit_area) regarding interpolation of nan values. Please see also my comments in #7665 for the motivation. This PR already involves a full implementation, documentation and corresponding tests, but before any final polishing, I want to hear your thoughts. Specifically, I think the API and default options need to be discussed. (See the proposed documentation of DataArray.interpolate_na() / Dataset.interpolate_na() for the current state) Implementation: Basically, I use ffill and bfill to calculate the coordinate of the left/right edge for every gap in the data. Based on edge coordinates, all masks (limit, limit_area, max_gap) are created. On the long term, it might be interesting to provide those arguments to other na-filling methods as well (ffill, bfill, fillna). Things to considerlimit_direction=forwardPros: - Backward compatible: If limit is not None, this is the current behaviour (see #7665) - Pandas compatible: Forward is the pandas default. Cons:
- limit_use_coordinates=FalsePros: - Backward compatible - Pandas compatible -> Both xarray and pandas have no support for coordinate based limits so far. Cons:
- Inconsistent with the current default of Generally, one might discuss if this separate argument is necessary or only one argument use_coordinates=TrueSo far, if there is no coordinate for PerformanceOn my machine, the new limit implementation based on ffill/bfill seems to be a little less performant (10%) than the old one (based on rolling). There might be potential for improvements. |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8577/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | ||||||
1615645463 | PR_kwDOAMm_X85Ll0US | 7598 | Fix missing 'dim' argument in _get_nan_block_lengths | Ockenfuss 42680748 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2023-03-08T17:28:56Z | 2023-03-23T16:04:32Z | 2023-03-16T18:55:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/7598 |
|
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7598/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [state_reason] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);