home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issues

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issues

4 rows where type = "pull" and user = 10563614 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: comments, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)

state 2

  • closed 2
  • open 2

type 1

  • pull · 4 ✖

repo 1

  • xarray 4
id node_id number title user state locked assignee milestone comments created_at updated_at ▲ closed_at author_association active_lock_reason draft pull_request body reactions performed_via_github_app state_reason repo type
715168959 MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NDk4MTIzNTQ2 4489 Alignment with tolerance2 ghislainp 10563614 open 0     4 2020-10-05T21:17:53Z 2023-12-14T19:22:57Z   CONTRIBUTOR   0 pydata/xarray/pulls/4489
  • [x] Closes #2217
  • [x] Tests added
  • [ ] Passes isort . && black . && mypy . && flake8
  • [ ] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in whats-new.rst
  • [ ] New functions/methods are listed in api.rst

Reading #2217, I've implemented fast algorithms for union and intersection of arrays with numerical tolerance. This works fine in the "normal" case, when each array has all its values different (outside the tolerance) and the first and second arrays have some values in common within the tolerance. Conversely, the behavior is not well defined when one array has some values that are within the tolerance (or are equal) of each other. In this case, the behavior of union and intersection is not well defined anyway. The "bad" cases could be checked to raise an Exception (duplicate values within the tolerance), but this is not implemented yet.

I've also implemented a function to test index equality within the tolerance.

At last, the logic of xarray.align has been changed to deal with the tolerance. It was not possible to avoid some changes in align.

I'd appreciate some tests and code review, because there are certainly some rough corners I've not though about.

{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4489/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 pull
1386596170 PR_kwDOAMm_X84_olQw 7085 solve a bug when the units attribute is not a string ghislainp 10563614 closed 0     2 2022-09-26T19:27:08Z 2022-09-28T19:13:11Z 2022-09-28T19:13:11Z CONTRIBUTOR   0 pydata/xarray/pulls/7085
  • [ ] Closes #xxxx
  • [x] Tests added
  • [ ] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in whats-new.rst
  • [ ] New functions/methods are listed in api.rst

We faced a sort of bug with a colleague of mine. It seems to be legal to set a numeric value to the units attributes in an xarray or a netcdf file. xarray accepts to save such an array to netcdf: xr.DataArray([1, 2, 3], attrs={'units': 1}, name='x').to_csv('tmp.nc'). Reading this netcdf file with xarray.open_dataset raises an error.

It is unlikely to have a scalar for the units, but at least it happened to us (the value was NaN) and this raised an exception very difficult to understand.

This raises an exception because "since" in attrs["units"] was called twice in xarray codebase (in coding_times.py and in conventions.py) without checking for the type of the attribute.

This PR solves this improbable bug

{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7085/reactions",
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 pull
709795317 MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NDkzNzYxOTQy 4467 Tolerance ghislainp 10563614 open 0 TomNicholas 35968931   1 2020-09-27T18:57:34Z 2022-06-09T14:50:17Z   CONTRIBUTOR   0 pydata/xarray/pulls/4467
  • [x] Closes #4465
  • [x] Tests added
  • [ ] Passes isort . && black . && mypy . && flake8
  • [ ] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in whats-new.rst
  • [ ] New functions/methods are listed in api.rst
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4467/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 pull
705182835 MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NDg5OTU2NDQ2 4442 Fix DataArray.to_dataframe when the array has MultiIndex ghislainp 10563614 closed 0     4 2020-09-20T20:45:12Z 2021-02-20T00:08:42Z 2021-02-20T00:08:42Z CONTRIBUTOR   0 pydata/xarray/pulls/4442
  • [X] Closes #3008
  • [x] Tests added
  • [x] Passes isort . && black . && mypy . && flake8
  • [ ] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in whats-new.rst
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4442/reactions",
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 pull

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issues] (
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [number] INTEGER,
   [title] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [state] TEXT,
   [locked] INTEGER,
   [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]),
   [comments] INTEGER,
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [closed_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [active_lock_reason] TEXT,
   [draft] INTEGER,
   [pull_request] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [state_reason] TEXT,
   [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]),
   [type] TEXT
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo]
    ON [issues] ([repo]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone]
    ON [issues] ([milestone]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee]
    ON [issues] ([assignee]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user]
    ON [issues] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 21.324ms · About: xarray-datasette