issues

Table actions

2 rows where state = "open" and user = 915118 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

type 1

state 1

  • open · 2 ✖

repo 1

id node_id number title user state locked assignee milestone comments created_at updated_at ▲ closed_at author_association active_lock_reason draft pull_request body reactions performed_via_github_app state_reason repo type
1869941964 I_kwDOAMm_X85vdQzM 8119 No-download mode needed for build amckinstry 915118 open 0     2 2023-08-28T15:03:03Z 2023-09-15T14:39:36Z   NONE      

What is your issue?

I'm Debian maintainer for xarray.

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-xarray

Debian/Ubuntu builds packages offline, from a frozen tarball (or possibly a small <5 number tarballs). xarray requires external objects for both building documentation and testing (we can do testing on our own CI/CD pipelines). Recent releases use pooch to download/cache test objects. We need a method of stating where the cache is (/home not an option -- that is directed to /non-existant on our build systems).

Can this be implemented, or how do you suggest we proceed?

Best regards Alastair McKinstry

 
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8119/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
     xarray 13221727 issue
1334835539 I_kwDOAMm_X85Pj_lT 6906 regression in cftime on s390 amckinstry 915118 open 0     10 2022-08-10T15:53:54Z 2022-09-17T12:20:41Z   NONE      

What happened?

This is on Debian, which supports the S390/s390X archs from IBM.

For the 2022.06.0 release: ======================================================================================== short test summary info ======================================================================================== FAILED xarray/tests/test_accessor_dt.py::test_calendar_cftime_2D[365_day] - pandas._libs.tslibs.np_datetime.OutOfBoundsDatetime: Out of bounds nanosecond timestamp: -809793270280017-04-14 16:00:00 FAILED xarray/tests/test_accessor_dt.py::test_calendar_cftime_2D[360_day] - pandas._libs.tslibs.np_datetime.OutOfBoundsDatetime: Out of bounds nanosecond timestamp: -809793270280017-04-14 16:00:00 FAILED xarray/tests/test_accessor_dt.py::test_calendar_cftime_2D[julian] - pandas._libs.tslibs.np_datetime.OutOfBoundsDatetime: Out of bounds nanosecond timestamp: -809793270280017-04-14 16:00:00 FAILED xarray/tests/test_accessor_dt.py::test_calendar_cftime_2D[all_leap] - pandas._libs.tslibs.np_datetime.OutOfBoundsDatetime: Out of bounds nanosecond timestamp: -809793270280017-04-14 16:00:00 FAILED xarray/tests/test_accessor_dt.py::test_calendar_cftime_2D[366_day] - pandas._libs.tslibs.np_datetime.OutOfBoundsDatetime: Out of bounds nanosecond timestamp: -809793270280017-04-14 16:00:00 FAILED xarray/tests/test_accessor_dt.py::test_calendar_cftime_2D[gregorian] - pandas._libs.tslibs.np_datetime.OutOfBoundsDatetime: Out of bounds nanosecond timestamp: -809793270280017-04-14 16:00:00 FAILED xarray/tests/test_accessor_dt.py::test_calendar_cftime_2D[proleptic_gregorian] - pandas._libs.tslibs.np_datetime.OutOfBoundsDatetime: Out of bounds nanosecond timestamp: -809793270280017-04-1

Details are tracked here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004870

What did you expect to happen?

No response

Minimal Complete Verifiable Example

No response

MVCE confirmation

  • [ ] Minimal example — the example is as focused as reasonably possible to demonstrate the underlying issue in xarray.
  • [ ] Complete example — the example is self-contained, including all data and the text of any traceback.
  • [ ] Verifiable example — the example copy & pastes into an IPython prompt or Binder notebook, returning the result.
  • [ ] New issue — a search of GitHub Issues suggests this is not a duplicate.

Relevant log output

No response

Anything else we need to know?

No response

Environment

Debian Sid cftime 1.6.1 pandas 1.3.5+dfsg python 3.10 This is in a build environment to test any possible fixes or debug. 
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6906/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
     xarray 13221727 issue

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issues] (
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [number] INTEGER,
   [title] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [state] TEXT,
   [locked] INTEGER,
   [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]),
   [comments] INTEGER,
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [closed_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [active_lock_reason] TEXT,
   [draft] INTEGER,
   [pull_request] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [state_reason] TEXT,
   [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]),
   [type] TEXT
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo]
    ON [issues] ([repo]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone]
    ON [issues] ([milestone]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee]
    ON [issues] ([assignee]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user]
    ON [issues] ([user]);