issues
5 rows where state = "open" and user = 45271239 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: comments, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2140225209 | PR_kwDOAMm_X85nLLgJ | 8761 | Use ruff for formatting | etienneschalk 45271239 | open | 0 | 10 | 2024-02-17T16:04:18Z | 2024-02-27T20:11:57Z | CONTRIBUTOR | 1 | pydata/xarray/pulls/8761 |
Note: many inline |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8761/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | ||||||
2140173727 | I_kwDOAMm_X85_kHWf | 8760 | Use `ruff` for formatting | etienneschalk 45271239 | open | 0 | 0 | 2024-02-17T15:07:17Z | 2024-02-26T05:58:53Z | CONTRIBUTOR | What is your issue?Use
|
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8760/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||||
2140968762 | I_kwDOAMm_X85_nJc6 | 8763 | Documentation 404 not found for "Suggest Edit" link in "API Reference" pages | etienneschalk 45271239 | open | 0 | 0 | 2024-02-18T12:39:25Z | 2024-02-18T12:39:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR | What happened?Concrete example: let's say I am currently reading the documentation of DataArray.resample. I would like to have a look at the internals and see the code directly on GitHub. We can see a GitHub icon, with 3 links: - Repositry: leads to the home page of the repo: https://github.com/pydata/xarray - Suggest edit: leads to a 404 not found as it points to the generated documentation - Open issue (generic link to open an issue) The What did you expect to happen?The second link "Suggest edit" should actually lead to the source code, as the documentation is auto-generated from the docstrings themselves. Maybe it could be renamed like "View source" Example of other repos having this feature: Minimal Complete Verifiable Example
MVCE confirmation
Relevant log output
Anything else we need to know?No response EnvironmentN/A |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8763/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||||
2135262747 | I_kwDOAMm_X85_RYYb | 8749 | Lack of resilience towards missing `_ARRAY_DIMENSIONS` xarray's special zarr attribute #280 | etienneschalk 45271239 | open | 0 | 2 | 2024-02-14T21:52:34Z | 2024-02-15T19:15:59Z | CONTRIBUTOR | What is your issue?Original issue: https://github.com/xarray-contrib/datatree/issues/280 Note: this issue description was generated from a notebook. You can use it to reproduce locally the bug. Lack of resilience towards missing
|
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8749/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||||
2117299976 | I_kwDOAMm_X85-M28I | 8705 | More granularity in the CI, separating code and docs changes? | etienneschalk 45271239 | open | 0 | 7 | 2024-02-04T20:54:30Z | 2024-02-15T14:51:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | What is your issue?Hi, TLDR: Is there a way to only run relevant CI checks (eg documentation) when a new commit is pushed on a PR's branch? The following issue is written from a naive user point of view. Indeed I do not know how the CI works on this project. I constated that when updating an existing Pull Request, the whole test battery is re-executed. However, it is a common scenario that someone wants to update only the documentation, for instance. In that case, it might make sense to only retrigger the documentation checks. A little bit like Another separation would be to have an "order" / "dependency system" in the pipeline. Eg, There is also a notion of frequency and execution time: pipelines' stages that are the most empirically likely to fail and the shortest to runshould be ran first, to avoid having them fail due to flakiness and out of bad luck when all the other checks passed before. Such a stage exists: |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8705/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [state_reason] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);