issues
4 rows where state = "closed", type = "pull" and user = 3924836 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1639815690 | PR_kwDOAMm_X85M2xOo | 7671 | Delete built-in rasterio backend | scottyhq 3924836 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2023-03-24T17:55:50Z | 2023-03-29T17:31:27Z | 2023-03-29T17:31:26Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/7671 | Following up on #5808, which deprecated XR.open_rasterio in favor of rioxarray this PR finally removes open_rasterio() entirely 2 years later! Closes #2314, closes #2535, closes #3489, closes #3776, closes #4655, closes #5207 (either outdated or ‘wontfix’ in favor of rioxarray) Maybe closes: 3921Discussion closure (mark answer as ‘use rioxarray discussions’?): 5840, #6485, #7327 |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7671/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 2, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
473142248 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzAxMzY4NjIw | 3162 | changed url for rasterio network test | scottyhq 3924836 | closed | 0 | 10 | 2019-07-26T02:06:20Z | 2019-07-31T00:28:53Z | 2019-07-31T00:28:46Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/3162 | fix failing rasterio network test by simplifying test and using same image url as rasterio library test suite - [x ] Closes #3083 |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3162/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
387123860 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjM1NjgyMjk4 | 2589 | added some logic to deal with rasterio objects in addition to filepaths | scottyhq 3924836 | closed | 0 | 14 | 2018-12-04T05:13:33Z | 2019-07-05T23:13:49Z | 2018-12-23T19:02:53Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/2589 | …h strings
|
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2589/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
412645481 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjU0ODA3NTgz | 2782 | enable loading remote hdf5 files | scottyhq 3924836 | closed | 0 | 9 | 2019-02-20T21:51:02Z | 2019-03-16T00:36:12Z | 2019-03-16T00:35:58Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/2782 | Enable loading remote hdf5 files. Will require h5py>2.9.0 and some changes to https://github.com/shoyer/h5netcdf. I've current just made a quick hack change to backends/api.py, so further tests are needed. Pinging @jhamman, @mrocklin, and @rabernat for thoughts on this. Here is a short notebook demonstrating how this works: https://gist.github.com/scottyhq/790bf19c7811b5c6243ce37aae252ca1
|
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2782/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [state_reason] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);