issues
5 rows where repo = 13221727, state = "closed" and user = 16700639 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1882430384 | PR_kwDOAMm_X85ZmUAI | 8147 | Add support for netCDF4.EnumType | bzah 16700639 | closed | 0 | 25 | 2023-09-05T17:20:50Z | 2024-01-17T19:10:51Z | 2024-01-17T07:19:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/8147 | This pull request add support for enums on netcdf4 backend. Enum were added in netCDF4-python in 1.2.0 (September 2015). In the netcdf format, they are defined as types and can be use across the dataset to type variable when on creation. They are meant to be an alternative to flag_values, flag_meanings. This pull request makes it possible for xarray to read existing enums in a file, convert them into flag_values/flag_meanings and save them as enums when an special encoding flag is filled in. TODO: - [x] Add implementation for other backends ? Will be added in follow-up PR
|
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8147/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
1880544087 | I_kwDOAMm_X85wFtNX | 8144 | Add support for netcdf4 enum | bzah 16700639 | closed | 0 | 10 | 2023-09-04T15:51:45Z | 2024-01-17T07:19:33Z | 2024-01-17T07:19:33Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Is your feature request related to a problem?When a netcdf file contains netcdf4 enums , xarray ignores the underlying enum type. The association between the values of the variable and their actual meaning is then lost. MRE: ```py import netCDF4 as nc import xarray as xr -- Create dataset with an enum using the netcdf4 libds = nc.Dataset("mre.nc", "w", format="NETCDF4") {'cloud_type': <class 'netCDF4._netCDF4.EnumType'>: name = 'cloud_type', numpy dtype = int64, fields/values ={'clear': 0, 'cloudy': 1}}ds.createVariable("cloud", cloud_type_enum) ds["cloud"][0] = 1 ds.close() -- Open dataset with xarrayxr_ds = xr.open_dataset("./mre.nc") print(xr_ds.cloud) <xarray.DataArray 'cloud' ()> \n [1 values with dtype=int64]--> We get no metadata about the cloud_type enum that we created abovexr.ds.to_netcdf("mre_xr.nc") -- Open xarray outputted dataset with netCDF4 libprint(nc.Dataset("mre_xr.nc", "r", format="NETCDF4").enumtypes()) {}--> Empty dictionary: the enum we created is lost``` If you know CF, enums could replace replace Describe the solution you'd likeAs far as I understand, to describe the enum we only need a dictionary that map numbers (enum key) to string (enum value) and a way to reference this dictionary in variables that are "typed" to this enum. Bear in mind that the dtype of the variable would still be a number, the enum type would be a secondary metadata. Describe alternatives you've consideredMost people that produce data could get away with using flag_meanings and flag_values to describe their data in a way which is both CF proof and properly managed by xarray. For me, the only workaround at the moment is to use the netCDF4 library directly. Additional context```py nc.version 1.6.2xr.version 2023.2.0``` |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8144/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||
1028755077 | PR_kwDOAMm_X84tTzzz | 5873 | Allow indexing unindexed dimensions using dask arrays | bzah 16700639 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2021-10-18T07:56:58Z | 2023-03-16T14:54:51Z | 2023-03-15T02:47:59Z | CONTRIBUTOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/5873 |
This is a naive attempt to make WIP The code presented here is mainly to support the discussion on #2511. It has not been unit tested and should probably not be merged as is. |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5873/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
1110611193 | PR_kwDOAMm_X84xZCtI | 6182 | DOC: fix dead link | bzah 16700639 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2022-01-21T15:41:49Z | 2022-01-21T16:19:07Z | 2022-01-21T16:16:26Z | CONTRIBUTOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/6182 | Fix link to "Generalized Universal Function API" of Numpy's doc |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6182/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
1077040836 | PR_kwDOAMm_X84vsEk4 | 6068 | DOC: Add "auto" to dataarray `chunk` method | bzah 16700639 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2021-12-10T16:50:24Z | 2022-01-03T21:35:02Z | 2022-01-03T21:35:02Z | CONTRIBUTOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/6068 |
This PR adds I wanted to add a unit test for |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6068/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [state_reason] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);