issues

Table actions

2 rows where "created_at" is on date 2023-10-14, repo = 13221727 and user = 2448579 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

type 1

state 1

repo 1

  • xarray · 2 ✖
id node_id number title user state locked assignee milestone comments created_at updated_at ▲ closed_at author_association active_lock_reason draft pull_request body reactions performed_via_github_app state_reason repo type
1943543755 I_kwDOAMm_X85z2B_L 8310 pydata/xarray as monorepo for Xarray and NamedArray dcherian 2448579 open 0     1 2023-10-14T20:34:51Z 2023-10-14T21:29:11Z   MEMBER      

What is your issue?

As we work through refactoring for NamedArray, it's pretty clear that Xarray will depend pretty closely on many files in namedarray/. For example various utils.py, pycompat.py, *ops.py, formatting.py, formatting_html.py at least. This promises to be quite painful if we did break NamedArray out in to its own repo (particularly around typing, e.g. https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/8309)

I propose we use pydata/xarray as a monorepo that serves two packages: NamedArray and Xarray. - We can move as much as is needed to have NamedArray be independent of Xarray, but Xarray will depend quite closely on many utility functions in NamedArray. - We can release both at the same time similar to dask and distributed. - We can re-evaluate if and when NamedArray grows its own community.

 
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8310/reactions",
    "total_count": 4,
    "+1": 4,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
     xarray 13221727 issue
1942893480 I_kwDOAMm_X85zzjOo 8306 keep_attrs for NamedArray dcherian 2448579 open 0     0 2023-10-14T02:29:54Z 2023-10-14T02:31:35Z   MEMBER      

What is your issue?

Copying over @max-sixty's comment from https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/8304#discussion_r1358873522

I haven't been in touch with the NameArray discussions so forgive a glib comment — but re https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3891 — this would be a "once-in-a-library" opportunity to always retain attrs in aggregations, removing the keep_attrs option in methods.

(Xarray could still handle them as it wished, so xarray's external interface wouldn't need to change immediately...)

@pydata/xarray Should we just delete the keep_attrs kwarg completely for NamedArray and always propagate attrs? obj.attrs.clear() seems just as easy to type.

 
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8306/reactions",
    "total_count": 4,
    "+1": 4,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
     xarray 13221727 issue

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issues] (
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [number] INTEGER,
   [title] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [state] TEXT,
   [locked] INTEGER,
   [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]),
   [comments] INTEGER,
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [closed_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [active_lock_reason] TEXT,
   [draft] INTEGER,
   [pull_request] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [state_reason] TEXT,
   [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]),
   [type] TEXT
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo]
    ON [issues] ([repo]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone]
    ON [issues] ([milestone]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee]
    ON [issues] ([assignee]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user]
    ON [issues] ([user]);