issues
1 row where comments = 9, type = "issue" and user = 20629530 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
857947050 | MDU6SXNzdWU4NTc5NDcwNTA= | 5155 | Calendar utilities | aulemahal 20629530 | closed | 0 | 9 | 2021-04-14T14:18:48Z | 2021-12-30T22:54:11Z | 2021-12-30T22:54:11Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Handling cftime and numpy time coordinates can sometimes be exhausting. Here I am thinking of the following common problems:
Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered We have implemented all this in (xclim)[https://xclim.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api.html#calendar-handling-utilities] (and more). But it seems to make sense that some of the simplest things there could move to xarray? We had this discussion in xarray-contrib/cf-xarray#193 and suggestion was made to see what fits here before implementing this there. Additional context At xclim, to differentiate numpy datetime64 from cftime types, we call the former "default". This way a time coordinate using cftime's "proleptic_gregorian" calendar is distinct from one using numpy's datetime64.
We also have an
What do you think? I have time to move whatever code makes sense to move. |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5155/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | xarray 13221727 | issue |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [state_reason] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);