issues
4 rows where comments = 3, state = "open" and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2266174558 | I_kwDOAMm_X86HExRe | 8975 | Xarray sponsorship guidelines | shoyer 1217238 | open | 0 | 3 | 2024-04-26T17:05:01Z | 2024-04-30T20:52:33Z | MEMBER | At what level of support should Xarray acknowledge sponsors on our website?I would like to surface this for open discussion because there are potential sponsoring organizations with conflicts of interest with members of Xarray's leadership team (e.g., Earthmover, which employs @jhamman, @rabernat and @dcherian). My suggestion is to use NumPy's guidelines, with an adjustment down to 1/3 of the thresholds to account for the smaller size of the project:
The NumPy guidelines also include a grace period of a minimum of 6 months for acknowledging support. I would suggest increasing this to a minimum of 1 year for Xarray. I would greatly appreciate any feedback from members of the community, either in this issue or on the next team meeting. |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8975/reactions", "total_count": 6, "+1": 5, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||||
588105641 | MDU6SXNzdWU1ODgxMDU2NDE= | 3893 | HTML repr in the online docs | shoyer 1217238 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-03-26T02:17:51Z | 2023-09-11T17:41:59Z | MEMBER | I noticed two minor issues in our online docs, now that we've switched to the hip new HTML repr by default.
|
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3893/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||||
176805500 | MDU6SXNzdWUxNzY4MDU1MDA= | 1004 | Remove IndexVariable.name | shoyer 1217238 | open | 0 | 3 | 2016-09-14T03:27:43Z | 2023-03-11T19:57:40Z | MEMBER | As discussed in #947, we should remove the |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1004/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||||
35633124 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNTYzMzEyNA== | 155 | Expose a public interface for CF encoding/decoding functions | shoyer 1217238 | open | 0 | 3 | 2014-06-12T23:33:42Z | 2019-02-04T04:17:40Z | MEMBER | Relevant discussion: #153 |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/155/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [state_reason] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);