issues
4 rows where comments = 10 and user = 2448579 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1874695065 | I_kwDOAMm_X85vvZOZ | 8125 | failing tests with pandas 2.1 | dcherian 2448579 | closed | 0 | 10 | 2023-08-31T02:42:32Z | 2023-09-15T13:12:02Z | 2023-09-15T13:12:02Z | MEMBER | What happened?See https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/8101
and this doctest
|
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8125/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||
684930038 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODQ5MzAwMzg= | 4372 | Set `allow_rechunk=True` in `apply_ufunc` | dcherian 2448579 | closed | 0 | 10 | 2020-08-24T20:02:50Z | 2020-09-09T19:00:17Z | 2020-09-09T19:00:17Z | MEMBER | What happened:
Minimal Complete Verifiable Example: ```python import operator a = xr.DataArray(np.arange(10), dims=("a")).chunk({"a": 2}) b = xr.DataArray(np.arange(10), dims=("a")).chunk({"a": 4}) xr.apply_ufunc(operator.add, a, b, dask="parallelized", output_dtypes=[a.dtype]).compute() ``` raises
on master but works with 0.16.0 I think we need to do If we want to avoid that, we'll need to go through a deprecation cycle. |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4372/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||
444520875 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mjc5MTY0MTQ2 | 2965 | Don't set encoding attributes on bounds variables. | dcherian 2448579 | closed | 0 | 10 | 2019-05-15T16:00:44Z | 2019-06-25T00:24:46Z | 2019-06-25T00:24:42Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/2965 | Here's a proposed fix for #2436 and #2921. Ping @spencerkclark @mathause @klindsay28
|
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2965/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
298481284 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTcwMTA4MjE1 | 1926 | Add x,y kwargs for plot.line(). | dcherian 2448579 | closed | 0 | 10 | 2018-02-20T06:04:35Z | 2018-05-10T05:12:03Z | 2018-03-05T22:14:46Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/1926 |
Description
ExampleThis code ```z = np.arange(10) da = xr.DataArray(np.cos(z), dims=['z'], coords=[z], name='f') xy = [[None, None], [None, 'f'], [None, 'z'], ['f', None], ['z', None], ['z', 'f'], ['f', 'z']] f, ax = plt.subplots(2,4) for aa, (x,y) in enumerate(xy): da.plot(x=x, y=y, ax=ax.flat[aa]) ax.flat[aa].set_title('x='+str(x)+ ' | '+'y='+str(y)) ``` yields Feedback requestedShould I refactor out the kwarg checking? |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1926/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [state_reason] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);