issues
3 rows where comments = 10, type = "pull" and user = 5635139 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1865945636 | PR_kwDOAMm_X85YvIJ4 | 8114 | Move `.rolling_exp` functions from `reduce` to `apply_ufunc` | max-sixty 5635139 | closed | 0 | 10 | 2023-08-24T21:57:19Z | 2023-09-19T01:13:27Z | 2023-09-19T01:13:22Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/8114 |
A similar change should solve #6528, but let's get one finished first... ~Posting for discussion, will comment inline~ Ready for merge |
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8114/reactions",
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
| 325609580 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTg5OTAwNDA1 | 2174 | Datasets more robust to non-string keys | max-sixty 5635139 | closed | 0 | 10 | 2018-05-23T08:53:36Z | 2018-05-28T01:44:02Z | 2018-05-27T20:48:31Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/2174 |
I don't think this is the most efficient way of doing this, though it does work. Any ideas for a more efficient implementation? |
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2174/reactions",
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
| 298437967 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTcwMDc4MTkw | 1924 | isort | max-sixty 5635139 | closed | 0 | 10 | 2018-02-20T00:32:51Z | 2018-02-27T19:33:38Z | 2018-02-27T19:33:35Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/1924 | Not sure if we want this? Probably too strict to enforce on every commit, more permissible to do a one-time update, assuming it doesn't cause merge conflicts. You can get the same result by running |
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1924/reactions",
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xarray 13221727 | pull |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] (
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[number] INTEGER,
[title] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[state] TEXT,
[locked] INTEGER,
[assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]),
[comments] INTEGER,
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[closed_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[active_lock_reason] TEXT,
[draft] INTEGER,
[pull_request] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[state_reason] TEXT,
[repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]),
[type] TEXT
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo]
ON [issues] ([repo]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone]
ON [issues] ([milestone]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee]
ON [issues] ([assignee]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user]
ON [issues] ([user]);