issues

Table actions

6 rows where comments = 1, draft = 1 and user = 14371165 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)

state 2

type 1

repo 1

id node_id number title user state locked assignee milestone comments created_at updated_at ▲ closed_at author_association active_lock_reason draft pull_request body reactions performed_via_github_app state_reason repo type
2241095068 PR_kwDOAMm_X85sixE5 8935 Use Variable.stack instead of np.ravel Illviljan 14371165 open 0     1 2024-04-12T23:04:35Z 2024-04-13T08:27:13Z   MEMBER   1 pydata/xarray/pulls/8935
  • [ ] Closes #xxxx
  • [ ] Tests added
  • [ ] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in whats-new.rst
  • [ ] New functions/methods are listed in api.rst
 
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8935/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
     xarray 13221727 pull
1410608825 PR_kwDOAMm_X85A4RjC 7173 Add LineCollection plot Illviljan 14371165 open 0     1 2022-10-16T20:16:28Z 2024-04-07T20:26:44Z   MEMBER   1 pydata/xarray/pulls/7173

This adds a line plotter based on LineCollections, called .lines at the moment.

I wanted to replace darray.plot() with using LineCollection instead. But unfortunately due to how many cases are supported (and tested in xarray) darray.plot() will continue using plt.plot.

xref:

4820

5622

 
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7173/reactions",
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
     xarray 13221727 pull
2203493958 PR_kwDOAMm_X85qiskT 8868 Try ruff lint for numpy 2.0 Illviljan 14371165 closed 0     1 2024-03-22T23:31:04Z 2024-03-22T23:34:11Z 2024-03-22T23:33:03Z MEMBER   1 pydata/xarray/pulls/8868 
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8868/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
     xarray 13221727 pull
1966567753 PR_kwDOAMm_X85eBydo 8386 Use get_args for duckarray checks Illviljan 14371165 closed 0     1 2023-10-28T11:58:57Z 2023-10-28T12:46:10Z 2023-10-28T12:45:32Z MEMBER   1 pydata/xarray/pulls/8386

xref: #8376

 
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8386/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
     xarray 13221727 pull
1931329996 PR_kwDOAMm_X85cK3Or 8281 Add high level from_array function in namedarray Illviljan 14371165 closed 0     1 2023-10-07T12:19:23Z 2023-10-10T17:10:37Z 2023-10-10T17:10:37Z MEMBER   1 pydata/xarray/pulls/8281

The Idea is to avoid as much normalization in the NamedArray class as possible. Different types are handled before initializing instead.

  • [ ] Closes #xxxx
  • [ ] Tests added
  • [ ] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in whats-new.rst
  • [ ] New functions/methods are listed in api.rst

References: https://github.com/tomwhite/cubed/blob/ea885193dd37d27917a24878b51bb086aaef5fb1/cubed/core/ops.py#L34 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74633074/how-to-type-hint-a-generic-numpy-array https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/arrays.scalars.html#scalars https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/040ed2dc9847265c581a342301dd87d2b518a3c2/numpy/init.pyi#L1423 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/040ed2dc9847265c581a342301dd87d2b518a3c2/numpy/_typing/_array_like.py#L32

Mypy issues: https://github.com/python/typing/issues/548

 
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8281/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
     xarray 13221727 pull
1549889322 PR_kwDOAMm_X85IKePm 7460 Add abstractmethods to backend classes Illviljan 14371165 open 0     1 2023-01-19T20:19:36Z 2023-07-29T11:42:33Z   MEMBER   1 pydata/xarray/pulls/7460

It's been unclear to me what methods are necessary to implement or not. I think decorating with @abstractmethod will help with that. It's a breaking change though and it could be disruptive.

  • [ ] Closes #xxxx
  • [ ] Tests added
  • [ ] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in whats-new.rst
  • [ ] New functions/methods are listed in api.rst
 
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7460/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
     xarray 13221727 pull

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issues] (
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [number] INTEGER,
   [title] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [state] TEXT,
   [locked] INTEGER,
   [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]),
   [comments] INTEGER,
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [closed_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [active_lock_reason] TEXT,
   [draft] INTEGER,
   [pull_request] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [state_reason] TEXT,
   [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]),
   [type] TEXT
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo]
    ON [issues] ([repo]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone]
    ON [issues] ([milestone]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee]
    ON [issues] ([assignee]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user]
    ON [issues] ([user]);