issues: 527323165
This data as json
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
527323165 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MjczMjMxNjU= | 3564 | DOC: from examples to tutorials | 1197350 | open | 0 | 14 | 2019-11-22T17:30:14Z | 2023-02-21T20:01:05Z | MEMBER | It's awesome to see the work we did at Scipy2019 finally hit the live docs! Thanks @keewis and @dcherian for pushing it through. Now that we have these more detailed, realistic examples, let's think about how we can take our documentation to the next level. I think we need TUTORIALS. The examples are a good start. I think we can build on these to create tutorials which walk through most of xarray's core features with a domain-specific datasets. We could have different tutorials for different fields. For example.
Each tutorial would cover the same core elements (loading data, indexing, aligning, grouping, computations, plotting, etc.), but using a familiar, real dataset, rather than the generic, made-up ones in our current docs. Yes, this would be a lot of work, but I think it would have a huge impact. Just raising here for discussion. xref #2980 #2378 #3131 |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3564/reactions", "total_count": 6, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 6, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
13221727 | issue |