issues: 437765416
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 437765416 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjczOTcxOTQy | 2922 | Feature/weighted | 10194086 | closed | 0 | 22 | 2019-04-26T17:09:02Z | 2021-02-03T14:47:52Z | 2020-03-19T14:29:43Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/2922 |
I took a shot at the weighted function - I added a ``` python import numpy as np import xarray as xr da = xr.DataArray([1, 2]) weights = xr.DataArray([4, 6]) da.weighted(weights).mean() <xarray.DataArray ()>array(1.6)``` There are quite a number of difficult edge cases with invalid data, that can be discussed.
It could be good to add all edge-case logic to a separate function but I am not sure if this is possible... |
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2922/reactions",
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
13221727 | pull |