issues: 345354038
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 345354038 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNDUzNTQwMzg= | 2323 | znetcdf: h5netcdf analog for zarr? | 1872600 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2018-07-27T20:17:58Z | 2020-07-28T06:25:33Z | 2020-07-28T06:25:33Z | NONE | I've been making good use of the zarr backend via So just as we have h5netcdf "Pythonic interface to netCDF4 via h5py", we could have "z5netcdf", a "Pythonic interface to netCDF4 via Zarr". I see that @shoyer previously had this idea: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1223#issuecomment-274230041 and also @rabernat https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1528#issuecomment-325226495 thinks it would be a good idea, so I'm just piling on from a user perspective! |
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2323/reactions",
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
completed | 13221727 | issue |