issues: 278335633
This data as json
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
278335633 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTU1NzY3NDc2 | 1752 | Refactor xarray.conventions into VariableCoder | 1217238 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2017-12-01T02:15:01Z | 2017-12-23T13:38:41Z | 2017-12-14T17:43:04Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/1752 | Building off of discussion in #1087, I would like to propose refactoring xarray.conventions to use an interface based on VariableCoder objects with encode() and decode() methods. The idea is make it easier to write new backends, by making decoding variables according to CF conventions as simple as calling decode() on each coder in a list of coders, with encoding defined by calling the same list of encoders in the opposite order. As a proof of concept, here I implement only a single Coder. In addition to making use of xarray's existing lazy indexing behavior, I have written it so that dask arrays are decoded using dask (which would solve #1372) Eventually, we should port all the coders in xarray.conventions to this new format. This is probably best saved for future PRs -- help would be appreciated!
|
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1752/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
13221727 | pull |