issues: 269182902
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 269182902 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTQ5MjQ2NDQ5 | 1664 | BUG: Added new names for pandas isna/notna unary functions | 500246 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2017-10-27T17:38:54Z | 2017-11-09T02:47:21Z | 2017-11-09T02:47:21Z | CONTRIBUTOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/1664 | In pandas commit https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/commit/793020293ee1e5fa023f45c12943a4ac51cc23d isna and notna were added as aliases for isnull and notnull. Those need to be added to PANDAS_UNARY_FUNCTIONS for xarray datasets notnull to work. Closes #1663.
Note: I'm not sure how to test for this, as I think existing tests should be already failing due to this. In fact, when I run I did not try the flake8 test and I think new documentation is exaggerated in this case. |
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1664/reactions",
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
13221727 | pull |