issues: 2108557477
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2108557477 | PR_kwDOAMm_X85lfTRf | 8684 | Enable `numbagg` in calculation of quantiles | 56583917 | closed | 0 | 5 | 2024-01-30T18:59:55Z | 2024-02-11T22:31:26Z | 2024-02-07T16:28:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/8684 |
Just saw your message in the related issue @max-sixty. This is what I came up with earlier. I also did a quick test, comparing the calculation with and without using numbagg for a dummy 3D DataArray. I was only wondering if the default usage of numbagg (given that it's available and |
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8684/reactions",
"total_count": 2,
"+1": 2,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
13221727 | pull |