issues: 2108557477
This data as json
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2108557477 | PR_kwDOAMm_X85lfTRf | 8684 | Enable `numbagg` in calculation of quantiles | 56583917 | closed | 0 | 5 | 2024-01-30T18:59:55Z | 2024-02-11T22:31:26Z | 2024-02-07T16:28:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/8684 |
Just saw your message in the related issue @max-sixty. This is what I came up with earlier. I also did a quick test, comparing the calculation with and without using numbagg for a dummy 3D DataArray. I was only wondering if the default usage of numbagg (given that it's available and |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8684/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
13221727 | pull |