issues: 171828347

I think we can bring all of NumPy's advanced indexing to xarray in a very consistent way, with only very minor breaks in backwards compatibility.

For boolean indexing: - da[key] where key is a boolean labelled array (with any number of dimensions) is made equivalent to da.where(key.reindex_like(ds), drop=True). This matches the existing behavior if key is a 1D boolean array. For multi-dimensional arrays, even though the result is now multi-dimensional, this coupled with automatic skipping of NaNs means that da[key].mean() gives the same result as in NumPy. - da[key] = value where key is a boolean labelled array can be made equivalent to da = da.where(*align(key.reindex_like(da), value.reindex_like(da))) (that is, the three argument form of where). - da[key_0, ..., key_n] where all of key_i are boolean arrays gets handled in the usual way. It is an IndexingError to supply multiple labelled keys if any of them are not already aligned with as the corresponding index coordinates (and share the same dimension name). If they want alignment, we suggest users simply write da[key_0 & ... & key_n].

For vectorized indexing (by integer or index value): - da[key_0, ..., key_n] where all of key_i are integer labelled arrays with any number of dimensions gets handled like NumPy, except instead of broadcasting numpy-style we do broadcasting xarray-style: - If any of key_i are unlabelled, 1D arrays (e.g., numpy arrays), we convert them into an xarray.Variable along the respective dimension. 0D arrays remain scalars. This ensures that the result of broadcasting them (in the next step) will be consistent with our current "outer indexing" behavior. Unlabelled higher dimensional arrays triggers an IndexingError. - We ensure all keys have the same dimensions/coordinates by mapping it to da[*broadcast(key_0, ..., key_n)] (note that broadcast now includes automatic alignment). - The result's dimensions and coordinates are copied from the broadcast keys. - The result's values are taken by mapping each set of integer locations specified by the broadcast version of key_i to the integer position on the corresponding ith axis on da. - Labeled indexing like ds.loc[key_0, ...., key_n] works exactly as above, except instead of doing integer lookup, we lookup label values in the corresponding index instead. - Indexing with .isel and .sel/.reindex works like the two previous cases, except we lookup axes by dimension name instead of axis position. - I haven't fully thought through the implications for assignment (da[key] = value or da.loc[key] = value), but I think it works in a straightforwardly similar fashion.

All of these methods should also work for indexing on Dataset by looping over Dataset variables in the usual way.

This framework neatly subsumes most of the major limitations with xarray's existing indexing: - Boolean indexing on multi-dimensional arrays works in an intuitive way, for both selection and assignment. - No more need for specialized methods (sel_points/isel_points) for pointwise indexing. If you want to select along the diagonal of an array, you simply need to supply indexers that use a new dimension. Instead of arr.sel_points(lat=stations.lat, lon=stations.lon, dim='station'), you would simply write arr.sel(lat=stations.lat, lon=stations.lon) -- the station dimension is taken automatically from the indexer. - Other use cases for NumPy's advanced indexing that currently are impossible in xarray also automatically work. For example, nearest neighbor interpolation to a completely different grid is now as simple as ds.reindex(lon=grid.lon, lat=grid.lat, method='nearest', tolerance=0.5) or ds.reindex_like(grid, method='nearest', tolerance=0.5).

Questions to consider: - How does this interact with @benbovy's enhancements for MultiIndex indexing? (#802 and #947) - How do we handle mixed slice and array indexing? In NumPy, this is a major source of confusion, because slicing is done before broadcasting and the order of slices in the result is handled separately from broadcast indices. I think we may be able to resolve this by mapping slices in this case to 1D arrays along their respective axes, and using our normal broadcasting rules. - Should we deprecate non-boolean indexing with [] and .loc[] and non-labelled arrays when some but not all dimensions are provided? Instead, we would require explicitly indexing like [key, ...] (yes, writing ...), which indicates "all trailing axes" like NumPy. This behavior has been suggested for new indexers in NumPy because it precludes a class of bugs where the array has an unexpected number of dimensions. On the other hand, it's not so necessary for us when we have explicit indexing by dimension name with .sel.

xref these comments from @MaximilianR and myself

Note: I would certainly welcome help making this happen from a contributor other than myself, though you should probably wait until I finish #964, first, which lays important groundwork.