issues: 1125030343
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1125030343 | I_kwDOAMm_X85DDpnH | 6243 | Maintenance improvements | 5635139 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-02-05T21:01:51Z | 2022-02-05T21:01:51Z | MEMBER | Is your feature request related to a problem?At the end of the dev call, we discussed ways to do better at maintenance. I'd like to make Xarray a wonderful place to contribute, partly because it was so formative for me in becoming more involved with software engineering. Describe the solution you'd likeWe've already come far, because of the hard work of many of us! A few ideas, in increasing order of radical-ness - We looked at @andersy005's dashboards for PRs & Issues. Could we expose this, both to hold ourselves accountable and signal to potential contributors that we care about turnaround time for their contributions? - Is there a systematic way of understanding who should review something? - FWIW a few months ago I looked for a bot that would recommend a reviewer based on who had contributed code in the past, which I think I've seen before. But I couldn't find one generally available. This would be really helpful — we wouldn't have n people each assessing whether they're the best reviewer for each contribution. If anyone does better than me at finding something like this, that would be awesome. - Could we add a label so people can say "now I'm waiting for a review", and track how long those stay up? - Ensuring the 95th percentile is < 2 days is more important than the median being in the hours. It does pain me when I see PRs get dropped for a few weeks. TBC, I'm as responsible as anyone. - Could we have a bot that asks for feedback on the review process — i.e. "I received a prompt and helpful review", "I would recommend a friend contribute to Xarray", etc? Describe alternatives you've consideredNo response Additional contextThere's always a danger with making stats legible that Goodhart's law strikes. And sometimes stats are not joyful, and lots of people come here for joy. So probably there's a tradeoff. |
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6243/reactions",
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
13221727 | issue |