id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,active_lock_reason,draft,pull_request,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,state_reason,repo,type
298822419,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTcwMzYzMDc4,1930,DOC: Plot discrete colormap with proportional colorbar,12703555,closed,0,,,5,2018-02-21T02:36:53Z,2018-03-01T00:05:58Z,2018-02-27T21:19:58Z,CONTRIBUTOR,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/1930,"Using 'cbar_kwargs' it is possible to extend the capabilities of colorbar ticks.

 - [x] Closes #1015 (remove if there is no corresponding issue, which should only be the case for minor changes)","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1930/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull
178501065,MDU6SXNzdWUxNzg1MDEwNjU=,1015,'levels' tick labels for discrete colormaps,12703555,closed,0,,,11,2016-09-22T01:38:15Z,2018-02-27T21:19:58Z,2018-02-27T21:19:58Z,CONTRIBUTOR,,,,"Hi there,

'levels' tick labels for discrete colormaps works fine for 10 intervals and tend to shorten by itself beyond 10. This behavior may exist to make colorbar exceeding 10 intervals look tidy.

However, for **discrete** colormaps it will be good to label the ticks for all intervals as they can be any number and not uniform.
xray.**version** = '0.8.2'

Please see the screenshots attached for a better understanding.

Thanks,
Vijay Paul
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/12703555/18734627/6bba1b54-80ca-11e6-9121-d3138cc71af1.png)

![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/12703555/18734553/bf405c1c-80c9-11e6-8efa-6aa7db1afad3.png)
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/12703555/18734557/ca46f530-80c9-11e6-8c6c-4c0c1985ab41.png)
","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1015/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed,13221727,issue