id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,active_lock_reason,draft,pull_request,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,state_reason,repo,type 477427854,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzA0NzU0OTc2,3187,reduce the size of example dataset in dask docs,868027,closed,0,,,4,2019-08-06T14:50:27Z,2019-08-06T20:41:39Z,2019-08-06T20:41:38Z,CONTRIBUTOR,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/3187,"Another attempt at getting the docs to build again on RTD (#3182). The current failure is due to high memory usage in the dask examples. I've converted the two most memory expensive code blocks into `:verbatim:` blocks so they don't use any additional memory. The contents of these blocks were taken from the last time the docs successfully built on RTD","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3187/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 477084478,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzA0NDgxOTY3,3186,bump rasterio to 1.0.24 in doc building environment,868027,closed,0,,,2,2019-08-05T22:24:59Z,2019-08-06T01:20:16Z,2019-08-06T01:20:15Z,CONTRIBUTOR,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/3186,"This is hopefully a fix for #3182 but I wasn't sure how to really test this on read the docs (RTD) itself. There may be a few things going on: * Local testing showed removing the ""auto_gallery"" dir would cause the failing gallery examples to actually be recognized as failing (i.e. bust the cache) * https://github.com/conda-forge/rasterio-feedstock/issues/118 and some examining of the `conda list` output on RTD for led me to think this was a deeper problem. Local testing with a bumped version of rasterio resulted in conda-forge being the channel source (rather than pip?), it also fixed the failing builds which relied on rasterio.","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3186/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 476323960,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzAzOTAzNjg1,3180,enable sphinx.ext.napoleon,868027,closed,0,,,3,2019-08-02T19:26:46Z,2019-08-02T21:17:43Z,2019-08-02T21:17:43Z,CONTRIBUTOR,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/3180,"Enables the napoleon extension in sphinx. This will interpret the numpydoc style parameters and types and convert them to sphinx `:param type name:` Note that `sphinx.ext.napoleon` must come before the `numpydoc` extension. Eventually the numpydoc dependency might be able to be removed but currently removing it makes the wrapped `ufunc` documentation omit the ""parameters"" and ""returns"", see the attached screenshot for what one of these ufuncs looks like with `numpydoc` removed. - [ ] Closes #3056 ","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3180/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 1, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 476317653,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzAzODk4NDE4,3179,remove type annotations from autodoc method signatures,868027,closed,0,,,1,2019-08-02T19:07:44Z,2019-08-02T20:17:59Z,2019-08-02T20:17:58Z,CONTRIBUTOR,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/3179,"This PR removes all the type hints from method signatures generated by sphinx.ext.autodoc. See http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/extensions/autodoc.html#confval-autodoc_typehints The sphinx documentation doesn't say which version this was added in, but I imagine it is quite recent. - [ ] Closes #3178","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3179/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 354539078,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjExMjc3OTMz,2386,fix typo in uri in the docs,868027,closed,0,,,1,2018-08-28T01:46:56Z,2018-08-28T01:49:02Z,2018-08-28T01:48:59Z,CONTRIBUTOR,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/2386,Seems I left off a trailing `>` in the `whats-new.rst`. Here is a minor fix for that.,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2386/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 345322908,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjA0NTA2MTg2,2322,BUG: modify behavior of Dataset.filter_by_attrs to match netCDF4.Data…,868027,closed,0,,,5,2018-07-27T18:25:42Z,2018-08-28T01:48:00Z,2018-08-28T01:21:20Z,CONTRIBUTOR,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/2322,"Here is my fix for #2315 which matches the behavior of Dataset.filter_by_attrs to be that of its netCDF4 inspiration. I followed the pattern seen in the netCDF4 library which set a boolean flag while looping over attributes and short circuits the loop if any test returns false. Only if all the ``key=value/callable`` tests pass is the variable added to the output. - [x] Closes #2315 - [x] Tests added (for all bug fixes or enhancements) - [x] Tests passed (for all non-documentation changes) - [x] Fully documented, including `whats-new.rst` for all changes and `api.rst` for new API (remove if this change should not be visible to users, e.g., if it is an internal clean-up, or if this is part of a larger project that will be documented later) ","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2322/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull