id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,active_lock_reason,draft,pull_request,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,state_reason,repo,type
1427457128,I_kwDOAMm_X85VFURo,7234, Inspecting arguments with accessors,3171991,open,0,,,2,2022-10-28T15:52:51Z,2022-10-31T19:30:38Z,,NONE,,,,"### What is your issue?

I recently read about the suggested approach to extending xarray here: [Extending xarray 2](https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/internals/extending-xarray.html)

We have a lot of functions on xarray datasets that are domain-specific enough to spatial mosaics that I think I want to start using these.

One issue I am seeing so far is that when I use the accessor in jupyter notebook, the arguments and docs are inspected and returned, which makes it nice and usable. However, within vscode, it is unable to inspect the args. The side effect is slower development and no more type checking, which isn’t ideal. This is also an issue with the rio accessor.

Am I missing something here? Has anyone noticed this and is there an existing fix? This must also be an issue with pandas custom accessors, too. Is there a way to more officially register accessors within my packages entry points?

For example
```
## inside notebooks
ds.sp.my_function() # I can inspect as usual
ds.rio.write_crs() # I can inspect as usual

## inside vscode
ds.sp.my_function() # I can not inspect the args or their types
ds.rio.write_crs() # I can not inspect the args or their types

```

I have seen [sphinx-autosummary-accessors — sphinx-autosummary-accessors documentation 1](https://sphinx-autosummary-accessors.readthedocs.io/en/stable/), but that only seems relevant for doc generation.","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7234/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,issue
1339129609,I_kwDOAMm_X85P0X8J,6916,Given zarr-backed Xarray determine store and group,3171991,open,0,,,3,2022-08-15T15:16:24Z,2022-09-12T18:40:07Z,,NONE,,,,"### What is your issue?

Given a zarr-backed xarray dataset, it would be nice to know the store and group and if it is zarr-backed or not. 

The `.encoding` attribute has the store, but does not have the group, which would be required to specify the exact dataset. 
```
dset = xr.open_zarr(
    store=""gs://some/path"",
    group='subdir'
)

dset.encoding
>>> {'source': 'gs://some/path'}
```


","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6916/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,issue