id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,active_lock_reason,draft,pull_request,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,state_reason,repo,type 1878288525,PR_kwDOAMm_X85ZYos5,8139,Fix pandas' `interpolate(fill_value=)` error,5635139,closed,0,,,6,2023-09-02T02:41:45Z,2023-09-28T16:48:51Z,2023-09-04T18:05:14Z,MEMBER,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/8139,"Pandas no longer has a `fill_value` parameter for `interpolate`. Weirdly I wasn't getting this locally, on pandas 2.1.0, only in CI on https://github.com/pydata/xarray/actions/runs/6054400455/job/16431747966?pr=8138. Removing it passes locally, let's see whether this works in CI Would close #8125 ","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8139/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 967854972,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NzEwMDA1NzY4,5694,Ask PRs to annotate tests,5635139,closed,0,,,6,2021-08-12T02:19:28Z,2023-09-28T16:46:19Z,2023-06-19T05:46:36Z,MEMBER,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/5694," - [x] Passes `pre-commit run --all-files` - [ ] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in `whats-new.rst` As discussed https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5690#issuecomment-897280353","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5694/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 729208432,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTA5NzM0NTM2,4540,numpy_groupies,5635139,closed,0,,,6,2020-10-26T03:37:19Z,2022-02-05T22:24:12Z,2021-10-24T00:18:52Z,MEMBER,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/4540," - [x] Closes https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4473 - [ ] Tests added - [x] Passes `isort . && black . && mypy . && flake8` - [ ] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in `whats-new.rst` - [ ] New functions/methods are listed in `api.rst` Very early effort — I found this harder than I expected — I was trying to use the existing groupby infra, but think I maybe should start afresh. The result of the `numpy_groupies` operation is a fully formed array, whereas we're used to handling an iterable of results which need to be concat. I also added some type signature / notes and I was going through the existing code; mostly for my own understanding If anyone has any thoughts, feel free to comment — otherwise I'll resume this soon","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4540/reactions"", ""total_count"": 4, ""+1"": 2, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 2, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 399164733,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjQ0NjU3NTk5,2674,Skipping variables in datasets that don't have the core dim,5635139,closed,0,,,6,2019-01-15T02:43:11Z,2021-05-13T22:02:19Z,2021-05-13T22:02:19Z,MEMBER,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/2674,"ref https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2650#issuecomment-454164295 This seems an ugly way of accomplishing the goal; any ideas for a better way of doing this? And stepping back, do others think a) it's helpful to skip variables in a dataset, and b) `apply_ufunc` should do this? ","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2674/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 575088962,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzgzMzAwMjgw,3826,Allow ellipsis to be used in stack,5635139,closed,0,,,6,2020-03-04T02:21:21Z,2020-03-20T01:20:54Z,2020-03-19T22:55:09Z,MEMBER,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/3826," - [x] Closes https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3814 - [x] Tests added - [x] Passes `isort -rc . && black . && mypy . && flake8` - [x] Fully documented, including `whats-new.rst` for all changes and `api.rst` for new API ","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3826/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 577283480,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mzg1MTA3OTU4,3846,Doctests fixes,5635139,closed,0,,,6,2020-03-07T05:44:27Z,2020-03-10T14:03:05Z,2020-03-10T14:03:00Z,MEMBER,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/3846," - [ ] Closes #xxxx - [ ] Tests added - [x] Passes `isort -rc . && black . && mypy . && flake8` - [ ] Fully documented, including `whats-new.rst` for all changes and `api.rst` for new API Starting to get some fixes in. It's going to be a long journey though. I think maybe we whitelist some files and move gradually through before whitelisting the whole library.","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3846/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 457080809,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mjg4OTY1MzQ4,3029,Fix pandas-dev tests ,5635139,closed,0,,,6,2019-06-17T18:15:16Z,2019-06-28T15:31:33Z,2019-06-28T15:31:28Z,MEMBER,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/3029,"Currently pandas-dev tests get 'stuck' on the conda install. The last instruction to run is the standard install: ``` $ if [[ ""$CONDA_ENV"" == ""docs"" ]]; then conda env create -n test_env --file doc/environment.yml; elif [[ ""$CONDA_ENV"" == ""lint"" ]]; then conda env create -n test_env --file ci/requirements-py37.yml; else conda env create -n test_env --file ci/requirements-$CONDA_ENV.yml; fi ``` And after installing the libraries, [it prints this and then stops](https://travis-ci.org/max-sixty/xarray/jobs/546491330): ``` Preparing transaction: - - done Verifying transaction: | / \ | / - \ | / / done Executing transaction: \ | / - \ | / - \ | / - \ | / - \ | / - \ | / / - \ | / - \ done No output has been received in the last 10m0s, this potentially indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself. ``` I'm not that familiar with conda. Anyone have any ideas as to why this would fail while the other builds would succeed? ","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3029/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull