id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,active_lock_reason,draft,pull_request,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,state_reason,repo,type
2266174558,I_kwDOAMm_X86HExRe,8975,Xarray sponsorship guidelines,1217238,open,0,,,3,2024-04-26T17:05:01Z,2024-04-30T20:52:33Z,,MEMBER,,,,"### At what level of support should Xarray acknowledge sponsors on our website?

I would like to surface this for open discussion because there are potential sponsoring organizations with conflicts of interest with members of Xarray's leadership team (e.g., [Earthmover](https://earthmover.io/), which employs @jhamman, @rabernat and @dcherian).

My suggestion is to use [NumPy's guidelines](https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0046-sponsorship-guidelines.html), with an adjustment down to 1/3 of the thresholds to account for the smaller size of the project:

- $10,000/yr for unrestricted financial contributions (e.g., donations)
- $20,000/yr for financial contributions for a particular purpose (e.g., grants)
- $30,000/yr for in-kind contributions (e.g., time for employees to contribute)
- 2 person-months/yr of paid work time for one or more Xarray maintainers or regular contributors to any Xarray team or activity

The NumPy guidelines also include a grace period of a minimum of 6 months for acknowledging support. I would suggest increasing this to a minimum of 1 year for Xarray.

I would greatly appreciate any feedback from members of the community, either in this issue or on the next [team meeting](https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/developers-meeting.html).","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8975/reactions"", ""total_count"": 6, ""+1"": 5, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 1, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,issue
588105641,MDU6SXNzdWU1ODgxMDU2NDE=,3893,HTML repr in the online docs,1217238,open,0,,,3,2020-03-26T02:17:51Z,2023-09-11T17:41:59Z,,MEMBER,,,,"I noticed two minor issues in our online docs, now that we've switched to the hip new HTML repr by default.

1. Most doc pages still show text, not HTML. I suspect this is a limitation of the [IPython sphinx derictive](https://ipython.readthedocs.io/en/stable/sphinxext.html) we use for our snippets. We might be able to fix that by switching to [jupyter-sphinx](https://jupyter-sphinx.readthedocs.io/en/latest/)?

2. The ""attributes"" part of the HTML repr in our notebook examples [looks a little funny](http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/examples/multidimensional-coords.html), with strange blue formatting around each attribute name. It looks like part of the outer style of our docs is leaking into the HTML repr:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1217238/77603390-31bc5a80-6ecd-11ea-911d-f2b6ed2714f6.png)
","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3893/reactions"", ""total_count"": 2, ""+1"": 2, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,issue
176805500,MDU6SXNzdWUxNzY4MDU1MDA=,1004,Remove IndexVariable.name,1217238,open,0,,,3,2016-09-14T03:27:43Z,2023-03-11T19:57:40Z,,MEMBER,,,,"As discussed in #947, we should remove the `IndexVariable.name` attribute. It should be fine to use an `IndexVariable` anywhere, regardless of whether or not it labels ticks along a dimension.
","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1004/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,issue
35633124,MDU6SXNzdWUzNTYzMzEyNA==,155,Expose a public interface for CF encoding/decoding functions,1217238,open,0,,,3,2014-06-12T23:33:42Z,2019-02-04T04:17:40Z,,MEMBER,,,,"Relevant discussion: #153 
","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/155/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,issue