id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,active_lock_reason,draft,pull_request,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,state_reason,repo,type 2034575163,PR_kwDOAMm_X85hn4Pn,8539,Filter out doctest warning,5635139,closed,0,,,11,2023-12-10T23:11:36Z,2023-12-12T06:37:54Z,2023-12-11T21:00:01Z,MEMBER,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/8539,"Trying to fix #8537. Not sure it'll work and can't test locally so seeing if it passes CI ","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8539/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 515662368,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzM1MDg1NTM4,3475,drop_vars; deprecate drop for variables,5635139,closed,0,,,11,2019-10-31T18:46:48Z,2019-11-07T23:20:40Z,2019-11-07T20:13:51Z,MEMBER,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/3475," Introduces `drop_vars`, and deprecates using `drop` for variables. `drop` is widely used for the deprecated case, so this is a fairly wide blast radius. It's more churn than is ideal, but I do think it's a much better API. This is ready for review, though I'm sure I'm missed references in the docs etc (took my peak regex skills to find/replace only the deprecated usages!) Originally discussed [here](https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3460) - [x] Tests added - [x] Passes `black . && mypy . && flake8` - [x] Fully documented, including `whats-new.rst` for all changes and `api.rst` for new API ","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3475/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 469871658,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mjk4OTk4MTE2,3142,Black,5635139,closed,0,,,11,2019-07-18T16:35:05Z,2019-08-08T20:55:14Z,2019-08-08T20:54:34Z,MEMBER,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/3142,"From https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3092 - [x] Reformat code - [x] CI checks - [x] Short instructions for how to merge an existing PR (i.e. avoid manual merge resolution) - Not sure if there's magic here - I think people would just have to format their code and then hope git can resolve (i.e. because there would still be no common parent)? - [x] Black badge - [x] Do we want to keep `flake8` checks? Black is mostly stricter but not always, e.g. on lines at the end of files. (+0.3 from me to use only `black` and stop using `flake8`) ~- [ ] Do we want to include `isort`? (-0.1 from me, even though I like the tool)~","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3142/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 1, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull 121601010,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTMzMzI4MDY=,677,Dataset constructor can take pandas objects,5635139,closed,0,,,11,2015-12-10T23:22:32Z,2016-01-02T07:44:26Z,2016-01-02T07:34:50Z,MEMBER,,0,pydata/xarray/pulls/677,"Closes a 'first-step' of https://github.com/xray/xray/issues/676. Works only for simple, non-MultiIndexed, pandas objects. ","{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/677/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,,13221727,pull