issue_comments
32 rows where user = 85085 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- tomwhite · 32 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1573764660 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7862#issuecomment-1573764660 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7862 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85dzb40 | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-06-02T13:44:43Z | 2023-06-02T13:44:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @kmuehlbauer thanks for adding tests! I'm not sure what the mypy error is either, I'm afraid... |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
CF encoding should preserve vlen dtype for empty arrays 1720045908 | |
1561308333 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7862#issuecomment-1561308333 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7862 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85dD6yt | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-05-24T14:51:23Z | 2023-05-24T14:51:23Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Yes - thanks!
The floating point default is preserved if you do e.g. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
CF encoding should preserve vlen dtype for empty arrays 1720045908 | |
1561240314 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7862#issuecomment-1561240314 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7862 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85dDqL6 | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-05-24T14:12:49Z | 2023-05-24T14:12:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
The code looks fine, and I get the same result when I run it with this PR. Your fix in https://github.com/kmuehlbauer/xarray/tree/preserve-vlen-string-dtype changes the metadata so it is correctly preserved as I feel less qualified to evaluate the impact of the netcdf4 fix. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
CF encoding should preserve vlen dtype for empty arrays 1720045908 | |
1561143111 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7862#issuecomment-1561143111 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7862 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85dDSdH | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-05-24T13:23:18Z | 2023-05-24T13:23:18Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks for taking a look @kmuehlbauer and for the useful example code. I hadn't considered the netcdf cases, so thanks for pointing those out.
Could netcdf4 do the same special-casing as h5netcdf? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
CF encoding should preserve vlen dtype for empty arrays 1720045908 | |
1554332081 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7019#issuecomment-1554332081 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7019 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cpTmx | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-05-19T10:01:06Z | 2023-05-19T10:01:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks for all your hard work on this @TomNicholas! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Generalize handling of chunked array types 1368740629 | |
1536054499 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7813#issuecomment-1536054499 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7813 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bjlTj | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-05-05T10:30:38Z | 2023-05-05T10:30:38Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ah I understand better now. This makes sense - if |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Task naming for general chunkmanagers 1694956396 | |
1534281206 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7813#issuecomment-1534281206 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7813 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bc0X2 | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-05-04T08:22:05Z | 2023-05-04T08:22:05Z | CONTRIBUTOR | If you hover over a node in the SVG representation you'll get a tooltip that shows the call stack and the line number of the top-level user function that invoked the computation. Does that help at all? (That said, I'm open to changing the way it is displayed, or how tasks are named in general.) BTW should this be moved to a cubed issue? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Task naming for general chunkmanagers 1694956396 | |
1516345065 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7424#issuecomment-1516345065 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7424 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85aYZbp | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-04-20T13:37:13Z | 2023-04-20T13:37:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Related issue: https://github.com/data-apis/array-api/issues/621 |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 1 } |
array api - Add tests for aggregations 1522810384 | |
1477628301 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7019#issuecomment-1477628301 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7019 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85YEtGN | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-03-21T10:54:51Z | 2023-03-21T10:54:51Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
I just released Cubed 0.6.0 which doesn't have a dependency on Dask, so this should be possible now. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Generalize handling of chunked array types 1368740629 | |
1471758792 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7424#issuecomment-1471758792 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7424 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85XuUHI | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-03-16T11:15:33Z | 2023-03-16T11:15:33Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I was hoping https://github.com/data-apis/array-api-compat might help with this, but I'm not sure it does... |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
array api - Add tests for aggregations 1522810384 | |
1469907455 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7019#issuecomment-1469907455 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7019 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85XnQH_ | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-03-15T12:21:23Z | 2023-03-15T12:21:23Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
That sounds like a good plan to me.
This is a useful list! I hope that we could close the gap for some of these over time.
Agreed. I have opened https://github.com/tomwhite/cubed/issues/154 to make it possible to test without a Dask dependency. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Generalize handling of chunked array types 1368740629 | |
1463469875 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7019#issuecomment-1463469875 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7019 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85XOscz | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-03-10T08:50:10Z | 2023-03-10T08:50:10Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Great work @TomNicholas! I don't have a strong opinion about the tests, but putting them in a new project to keep xarray changes to a minimum is probably a good idea for the moment. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Generalize handling of chunked array types 1368740629 | |
1373701291 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7387#issuecomment-1373701291 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7387 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85R4QSr | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-01-06T14:18:08Z | 2023-01-06T14:18:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks for the review @Illviljan |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Make `broadcast` and `concat` work with the Array API 1502721600 | |
1330343446 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7328#issuecomment-1330343446 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7328 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85PS24W | tomwhite 85085 | 2022-11-29T09:36:10Z | 2022-11-29T09:37:19Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This behaviour stems from this part of Is there any reason we couldn't |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Zarr store array dtype changes for empty object string 1466586967 | |
1323743039 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7292#issuecomment-1323743039 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7292 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85O5rc_ | tomwhite 85085 | 2022-11-22T14:12:57Z | 2022-11-22T14:12:57Z | CONTRIBUTOR | You can work around this by specifying either
prints Does that help? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`dtype` of `zarr` array unexpectedly changes when `fill_value` is specified 1451961530 | |
1286703986 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6807#issuecomment-1286703986 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6807 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85MsYty | tomwhite 85085 | 2022-10-21T09:31:29Z | 2022-10-21T09:31:29Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Cubed implements |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Alternative parallel execution frameworks in xarray 1308715638 | |
1285349000 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7019#issuecomment-1285349000 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7019 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85MnN6I | tomwhite 85085 | 2022-10-20T11:15:50Z | 2022-10-20T11:15:50Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @TomNicholas it might be good to rebase this now that #7067 is in. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Generalize handling of chunked array types 1368740629 | |
1260795929 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7067#issuecomment-1260795929 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7067 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LJjgZ | tomwhite 85085 | 2022-09-28T11:56:30Z | 2022-09-28T11:56:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Updated with all the suggestions. How does this look now? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
More Array API changes 1382574245 | |
1256212506 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7067#issuecomment-1256212506 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7067 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85K4Ega | tomwhite 85085 | 2022-09-23T13:28:01Z | 2022-09-23T13:28:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This is great feedback - thanks @keewis! I will take a look at implementing your suggestions. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
More Array API changes 1382574245 | |
1255158880 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7019#issuecomment-1255158880 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7019 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85K0DRg | tomwhite 85085 | 2022-09-22T15:03:34Z | 2022-09-22T15:03:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I think the I'm interested in trying this out on some of our genomics use cases in sgkit (see https://github.com/pystatgen/sgkit/issues/908), so please let me know when you think it's ready to try @TomNicholas. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Generalize handling of chunked array types 1368740629 | |
1190162973 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3232#issuecomment-1190162973 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3232 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85G8HId | tomwhite 85085 | 2022-07-20T11:35:03Z | 2022-07-20T11:35:03Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
It needs |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use pytorch as backend for xarrays 482543307 | |
1189941650 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3232#issuecomment-1189941650 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3232 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85G7RGS | tomwhite 85085 | 2022-07-20T07:45:39Z | 2022-07-20T07:45:39Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hi @hsharrison - thanks for offering to do some testing. Here's a little demo script that you could try, by switching |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use pytorch as backend for xarrays 482543307 | |
1188910765 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6807#issuecomment-1188910765 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6807 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85G3Vat | tomwhite 85085 | 2022-07-19T10:58:18Z | 2022-07-19T10:58:18Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks for opening this @TomNicholas
Agreed. I feel like there's already an implicit set of "chunked array" methods that xarray expects from Dask that could be formalised a bit and exposed as an integration point. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Alternative parallel execution frameworks in xarray 1308715638 | |
1187007032 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3232#issuecomment-1187007032 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3232 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85GwEo4 | tomwhite 85085 | 2022-07-18T10:04:29Z | 2022-07-18T10:04:29Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Opened #6804 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use pytorch as backend for xarrays 482543307 | |
1182978725 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3232#issuecomment-1182978725 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3232 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85GgtKl | tomwhite 85085 | 2022-07-13T09:18:51Z | 2022-07-13T09:18:51Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I started having a look at making xarray work with the array API here: https://github.com/tomwhite/xarray/commit/c72a1c4a4c52152bdab83f60f35615de28e8be7f. Some basic operations work (preserving the underlying array): https://github.com/tomwhite/xarray/commit/929812a12818ffaa1187eb860c9b61e3fc03973c. If there's interest, I'd be happy to turn this into a PR with some tests. |
{ "total_count": 4, "+1": 4, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use pytorch as backend for xarrays 482543307 | |
1072259361 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6373#issuecomment-1072259361 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6373 | IC_kwDOAMm_X84_6WEh | tomwhite 85085 | 2022-03-18T10:06:01Z | 2022-03-18T10:06:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks for confirming @jhamman |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Zarr backend should avoid checking for invalid encodings 1171932478 | |
832596127 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5235#issuecomment-832596127 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5235 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgzMjU5NjEyNw== | tomwhite 85085 | 2021-05-05T10:54:17Z | 2021-05-05T10:54:17Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This is now passing. We could add more tests or even change the representation a little in some cases, but it would be good to merge for the release (since it fixes a bug) if it looks OK to you @keewis. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix exception when display_expand_data=False for file-backed array. 870782371 | |
827415452 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5126#issuecomment-827415452 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5126 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyNzQxNTQ1Mg== | tomwhite 85085 | 2021-04-27T08:19:48Z | 2021-04-27T08:19:48Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thank you! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add options to control expand/collapse of sections in display of Dataset and DataArray 852280544 | |
826719320 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5126#issuecomment-826719320 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5126 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyNjcxOTMyMA== | tomwhite 85085 | 2021-04-26T10:30:20Z | 2021-04-26T10:30:20Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @max-sixty yes - I've rebased and updated whats-new. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add options to control expand/collapse of sections in display of Dataset and DataArray 852280544 | |
824952098 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5126#issuecomment-824952098 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5126 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyNDk1MjA5OA== | tomwhite 85085 | 2021-04-22T15:40:02Z | 2021-04-22T15:40:02Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks for the review @jsignell! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add options to control expand/collapse of sections in display of Dataset and DataArray 852280544 | |
814813584 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4230#issuecomment-814813584 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4230 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgxNDgxMzU4NA== | tomwhite 85085 | 2021-04-07T10:51:31Z | 2021-04-07T10:51:31Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks for the suggestions @dcherian! I've implemented I haven't implemented the nested options for |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
provide set_option `collapse_html` to control HTML repr collapsed state 657792526 | |
814059710 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4230#issuecomment-814059710 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4230 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgxNDA1OTcxMA== | tomwhite 85085 | 2021-04-06T11:54:06Z | 2021-04-06T11:54:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I would find it useful to have a generalized version of this for datasets, so it's possible to control independently whether the coordinates, data variables, and attributes sections are expanded by default. I'd be happy to pick this up if no one else is working on it. I have created a branch to try it out, which adds the options One thing I'm not sure about is maintaining the existing behaviour, which is that for the HTML dataset repr all three sections are expanded by default, up to a certain size limit, depending on the section (25 coordinates, 15 data variables, 10 attributes).
I couldn't see a simple way to incorporate that, although maybe it's not needed if the sections can be collapsed by setting an option (e.g. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
provide set_option `collapse_html` to control HTML repr collapsed state 657792526 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 14